[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2415f4931a364541b2e6d14a8185ffbb@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 07:46:53 +0000
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
CC: "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>,
"martin.lau@...ux.dev" <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
"song@...nel.org" <song@...nel.org>, "yhs@...com" <yhs@...com>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"kpsingh@...nel.org" <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
"sdf@...gle.com" <sdf@...gle.com>,
"haoluo@...gle.com" <haoluo@...gle.com>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"paul@...l-moore.com" <paul@...l-moore.com>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"serge@...lyn.com" <serge@...lyn.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"keyrings@...r.kernel.org" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v10 5/9] bpf: Add bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put()
kfuncs
> From: Alexei Starovoitov [mailto:alexei.starovoitov@...il.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 11:34 PM
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 06:59:28PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > +
> > +static int __init bpf_key_sig_kfuncs_init(void)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
> > + &bpf_key_sig_kfunc_set);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM,
> > + &bpf_key_sig_kfunc_set);
>
> Isn't this a watery water ?
> Don't you have a patch 1 ?
> What am I missing ?
Uhm, yes. I had doubts too. That was what also KP did.
It makes sense to register once, since we mapped LSM to
TRACING.
Will resend only this patch. And I will figure out why CI failed.
Roberto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists