[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a063d48a-2096-ba5b-7f65-d55fec49d534@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:15:50 +0300
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: "zhiyong.tao" <zhiyong.tao@...iatek.com>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, eddie.huang@...iatek.com, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, fshao@...omium.org
Cc: sen.chu@...iatek.com, hui.liu@...iatek.com,
allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com, hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, macpaul.lin@...iatek.com,
wen.su@...iatek.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
zhiyong tao <zhiyong.tao@...iatk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pmic: add mt6366 regulator document
On 11/08/2022 12:14, zhiyong.tao wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-08-11 at 11:58 +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 11/08/2022 11:42, zhiyong.tao wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: zhiyong tao <zhiyong.tao@...iatk.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> .../regulator/mediatek,mt6366-regulator.yaml | 375
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 375 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> Subject does not match subsystem.
>>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> Do you mean that we should change the title like this:
>>> regulator: dt-bindings: mediatek: add mt6366 regulator document
>>> is it right?
>>
>> Yes. And remove redundant pieces so for example:
>>
>> regulator: dt-bindings: mediatek: add mt6366
>> or:
>> regulator: dt-bindings: add mediatek,mt6366
> ==>
> Thanks for your suggestion, we will fix it in next verison.
>>
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>>>> + patternProperties:
>>>>> + "^buck-
>>>>> v(dram1|core|coresshub|proc11|proc12|gpu|s2|modem|s1)$":
>>>>> + type: object
>>>>> + $ref: "regulator.yaml#"
>>>>
>>>> No need for quotes.
>>>
>>> ==>
>>> We will remove the line "$ref: "regulator.yaml#"" in next verison,
>>> is
>>> it right?
>>
>> No, it is not. Why do you want to remove it?
> ==>
> We don't understand "No need for quotes."which means.
> Do you mean that we should remove the quotation marks.
> We will change it like this:$ref: regulator.yaml#
> is it right?
Yes, remove the quotation marks. You wanted to remove entire line which
is not correct. $ref should stay.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists