lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48524c3d-c858-15ec-ac79-9547f3489b7b@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:11:41 +0100
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools headers arm64: Fix compilation failure

Hi Leo

On 11/08/2022 05:43, Leo Yan wrote:
> When build perf tool on x86_64, it reports failure for finding the
> header <asm/sysreg.h>:
> 

Please could you mention the exact build options used for the perf
build ? (e.g, enable SPE)

>    In file included from util/arm-spe.c:37:
>    util/../../arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h:183:10: fatal error: asm/sysreg.h: No such file or directory
>      183 | #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>          |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    compilation terminated.
>  > There have no sysreg.h in x86's asm folder, alternatively, this patch
> includes the sysreg.h header in the same folder with cputype.h to fix
> the compilation failure.

Wondering how the "cputype.h" was picked up from arch/arm64/include/ and
why not the sysreg.h ? Ideally, we would like to pickup the kernel
headers as it is without having to manually fixup, things like this.

> 
> Fixes: 37402d5d061b ("tools headers arm64: Sync arm64's cputype.h with the kernel sources")

Also from the above commit,

"That addresses this perf build warning:

       Warning: Kernel ABI header at 
'tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h' differs from latest version at 
'arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h'
       diff -u tools/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h 
arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
"

Wouldn't we re-introduce the warning back ?

Suzuki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ