[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a79262e2-a190-677f-034b-56757a085280@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:38:51 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <wsa@...nel.org>, <Daire.McNamara@...rochip.com>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<andreas.buerkler@...lustra.com>, <Lewis.Hanly@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: microchip-core: fix erroneous late ack send
On 11/08/2022 13:28, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 08:43:46AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> A late ack is currently being sent at the end of a transfer due to
>> incorrect logic in mchp_corei2c_empty_rx(). Currently the Assert Ack
>> bit is being written to the controller's control reg after the last
>> byte has been received, causing it to sent another byte with the ack.
>> Instead, the AA flag should be written to to the contol register when
>> the penultimate byte is read so it is sent out for the last byte.
>>
>> Reported-by: Andreas Buerkler <andreas.buerkler@...lustra.com>
>> Fixes: 64a6f1c4987e ("i2c: add support for microchip fpga i2c controllers")
>> Tested-by: Lewis Hanly <lewis.hanly@...rochip.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> Fixed these checkpatch warnings:
>
> WARNING: 'contol' may be misspelled - perhaps 'control'?
> WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'to'
Heh, that's what I get for editing the commit in send-email..
>
> and applied to for-current, thanks!
Thanks :)
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists