[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220811135549.23965-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 21:55:49 +0800
From: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
To: aliakc@....de
Cc: oliver@...kum.org, lenehan@...bble.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, dc395x@...bble.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: dc395x: Fix comment typo
The double `the' is duplicated in the comment, remove one.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
---
drivers/scsi/dc395x.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/dc395x.c b/drivers/scsi/dc395x.c
index 670a836a6ba1..7c7fd511cffe 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/dc395x.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/dc395x.c
@@ -2052,7 +2052,7 @@ static void data_in_phase0(struct AdapterCtlBlk *acb, struct ScsiReqBlk *srb,
/*
* KG: We should wait for the DMA FIFO to be empty ...
* but: it would be better to wait first for the SCSI FIFO and then the
- * the DMA FIFO to become empty? How do we know, that the device not already
+ * DMA FIFO to become empty? How do we know, that the device not already
* sent data to the FIFO in a MsgIn phase, eg.?
*/
if (!(DC395x_read8(acb, TRM_S1040_DMA_FIFOSTAT) & 0x80)) {
--
2.36.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists