| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220811152851.1520029-30-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:27:14 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, linux@...pel-privat.de,
sean.anderson@...o.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 030/105] net: dsa: ar9331: fix potential dead lock on mdio access
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
[ Upstream commit 7a49f2193063b7db60a964fc26774275a4c964cd ]
Rework MDIO locking to avoid potential circular locking:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.19.0-rc1-ar9331-00017-g3ab364c7c48c #5 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u2:4/68 is trying to acquire lock:
81f3c83c (ar9331:1005:(&ar9331_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: regmap_write+0x50/0x8c
but task is already holding lock:
81f60494 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: mdiobus_read+0x40/0x78
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0x2d4/0x360
__mutex_lock+0xf8/0x384
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38
mdiobus_write+0x44/0x80
ar9331_sw_bus_write+0x50/0xe4
_regmap_raw_write_impl+0x604/0x724
_regmap_bus_raw_write+0x9c/0xb4
_regmap_write+0xdc/0x1a0
_regmap_update_bits+0xf4/0x118
_regmap_select_page+0x108/0x138
_regmap_raw_read+0x25c/0x288
_regmap_bus_read+0x60/0x98
_regmap_read+0xd4/0x1b0
_regmap_update_bits+0xc4/0x118
regmap_update_bits_base+0x64/0x8c
ar9331_sw_irq_bus_sync_unlock+0x40/0x6c
__irq_set_handler+0x7c/0xac
ar9331_sw_irq_map+0x48/0x7c
irq_domain_associate+0x174/0x208
irq_create_mapping_affinity+0x1a8/0x230
ar9331_sw_probe+0x22c/0x388
mdio_probe+0x44/0x70
really_probe+0x200/0x424
__driver_probe_device+0x290/0x298
driver_probe_device+0x54/0xe4
__device_attach_driver+0xe4/0x130
bus_for_each_drv+0xb4/0xd8
__device_attach+0x104/0x1a4
bus_probe_device+0x48/0xc4
device_add+0x600/0x800
mdio_device_register+0x68/0xa0
of_mdiobus_register+0x2bc/0x3c4
ag71xx_probe+0x6e4/0x984
platform_probe+0x78/0xd0
really_probe+0x200/0x424
__driver_probe_device+0x290/0x298
driver_probe_device+0x54/0xe4
__driver_attach+0x17c/0x190
bus_for_each_dev+0x8c/0xd0
bus_add_driver+0x110/0x228
driver_register+0xe4/0x12c
do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2a0
kernel_init_freeable+0x250/0x288
kernel_init+0x34/0x130
ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
-> #0 (ar9331:1005:(&ar9331_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
check_noncircular+0x88/0xc0
__lock_acquire+0x10bc/0x18bc
lock_acquire+0x2d4/0x360
__mutex_lock+0xf8/0x384
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38
regmap_write+0x50/0x8c
ar9331_sw_mbus_read+0x74/0x1b8
__mdiobus_read+0x90/0xec
mdiobus_read+0x50/0x78
get_phy_device+0xa0/0x18c
fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy+0x120/0x1d4
of_mdiobus_register+0x244/0x3c4
devm_of_mdiobus_register+0xe8/0x100
ar9331_sw_setup+0x16c/0x3a0
dsa_register_switch+0x7dc/0xcc0
ar9331_sw_probe+0x370/0x388
mdio_probe+0x44/0x70
really_probe+0x200/0x424
__driver_probe_device+0x290/0x298
driver_probe_device+0x54/0xe4
__device_attach_driver+0xe4/0x130
bus_for_each_drv+0xb4/0xd8
__device_attach+0x104/0x1a4
bus_probe_device+0x48/0xc4
deferred_probe_work_func+0xf0/0x10c
process_one_work+0x314/0x4d4
worker_thread+0x2a4/0x354
kthread+0x134/0x13c
ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&bus->mdio_lock);
lock(ar9331:1005:(&ar9331_mdio_regmap_config)->lock);
lock(&bus->mdio_lock);
lock(ar9331:1005:(&ar9331_mdio_regmap_config)->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
5 locks held by kworker/u2:4/68:
#0: 81c04eb4 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1e4/0x4d4
#1: 81f0de78 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1e4/0x4d4
#2: 81f0a880 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach+0x40/0x1a4
#3: 80c8aee0 (dsa2_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dsa_register_switch+0x5c/0xcc0
#4: 81f60494 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: mdiobus_read+0x40/0x78
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 68 Comm: kworker/u2:4 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc1-ar9331-00017-g3ab364c7c48c #5
Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
Stack : 00000056 800d4638 81f0d64c 00000004 00000018 00000000 80a20000 80a20000
80937590 81ef3858 81f0d760 3913578a 00000005 8045e824 81f0d600 a8db84cc
00000000 00000000 80937590 00000a44 00000000 00000002 00000001 ffffffff
81f0d6a4 80982d7c 0000000f 20202020 80a20000 00000001 80937590 81ef3858
81f0d760 3913578a 00000005 00000005 00000000 03bd0000 00000000 80e00000
...
Call Trace:
[<80069db0>] show_stack+0x94/0x130
[<8045e824>] dump_stack_lvl+0x54/0x8c
[<800c7fac>] check_noncircular+0x88/0xc0
[<800ca068>] __lock_acquire+0x10bc/0x18bc
[<800cb478>] lock_acquire+0x2d4/0x360
[<807b84c4>] __mutex_lock+0xf8/0x384
[<807b877c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38
[<804ea640>] regmap_write+0x50/0x8c
[<80501e38>] ar9331_sw_mbus_read+0x74/0x1b8
[<804fe9a0>] __mdiobus_read+0x90/0xec
[<804feac4>] mdiobus_read+0x50/0x78
[<804fcf74>] get_phy_device+0xa0/0x18c
[<804ffeb4>] fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy+0x120/0x1d4
[<805004f0>] of_mdiobus_register+0x244/0x3c4
[<804f0c50>] devm_of_mdiobus_register+0xe8/0x100
[<805017a0>] ar9331_sw_setup+0x16c/0x3a0
[<807355c8>] dsa_register_switch+0x7dc/0xcc0
[<80501468>] ar9331_sw_probe+0x370/0x388
[<804ff0c0>] mdio_probe+0x44/0x70
[<804d1848>] really_probe+0x200/0x424
[<804d1cfc>] __driver_probe_device+0x290/0x298
[<804d1d58>] driver_probe_device+0x54/0xe4
[<804d2298>] __device_attach_driver+0xe4/0x130
[<804cf048>] bus_for_each_drv+0xb4/0xd8
[<804d200c>] __device_attach+0x104/0x1a4
[<804d026c>] bus_probe_device+0x48/0xc4
[<804d108c>] deferred_probe_work_func+0xf0/0x10c
[<800a0ffc>] process_one_work+0x314/0x4d4
[<800a17fc>] worker_thread+0x2a4/0x354
[<800a9a54>] kthread+0x134/0x13c
[<8006306c>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
[
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220616112550.877118-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c b/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
index e5098cfe44bc..f23ce56fa591 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static int __ar9331_mdio_write(struct mii_bus *sbus, u8 mode, u16 reg, u16 val)
FIELD_GET(AR9331_SW_LOW_ADDR_PHY, reg);
r = FIELD_GET(AR9331_SW_LOW_ADDR_REG, reg);
- return mdiobus_write(sbus, p, r, val);
+ return __mdiobus_write(sbus, p, r, val);
}
static int __ar9331_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *sbus, u16 reg)
@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static int __ar9331_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *sbus, u16 reg)
FIELD_GET(AR9331_SW_LOW_ADDR_PHY, reg);
r = FIELD_GET(AR9331_SW_LOW_ADDR_REG, reg);
- return mdiobus_read(sbus, p, r);
+ return __mdiobus_read(sbus, p, r);
}
static int ar9331_mdio_read(void *ctx, const void *reg_buf, size_t reg_len,
@@ -849,6 +849,8 @@ static int ar9331_mdio_read(void *ctx, const void *reg_buf, size_t reg_len,
return 0;
}
+ mutex_lock_nested(&sbus->mdio_lock, MDIO_MUTEX_NESTED);
+
ret = __ar9331_mdio_read(sbus, reg);
if (ret < 0)
goto error;
@@ -860,9 +862,13 @@ static int ar9331_mdio_read(void *ctx, const void *reg_buf, size_t reg_len,
*(u32 *)val_buf |= ret << 16;
+ mutex_unlock(&sbus->mdio_lock);
+
return 0;
error:
+ mutex_unlock(&sbus->mdio_lock);
dev_err_ratelimited(&sbus->dev, "Bus error. Failed to read register.\n");
+
return ret;
}
@@ -872,12 +878,15 @@ static int ar9331_mdio_write(void *ctx, u32 reg, u32 val)
struct mii_bus *sbus = priv->sbus;
int ret;
+ mutex_lock_nested(&sbus->mdio_lock, MDIO_MUTEX_NESTED);
if (reg == AR9331_SW_REG_PAGE) {
ret = __ar9331_mdio_write(sbus, AR9331_SW_MDIO_PHY_MODE_PAGE,
0, val);
if (ret < 0)
goto error;
+ mutex_unlock(&sbus->mdio_lock);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -897,10 +906,14 @@ static int ar9331_mdio_write(void *ctx, u32 reg, u32 val)
if (ret < 0)
goto error;
+ mutex_unlock(&sbus->mdio_lock);
+
return 0;
error:
+ mutex_unlock(&sbus->mdio_lock);
dev_err_ratelimited(&sbus->dev, "Bus error. Failed to write register.\n");
+
return ret;
}
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists