[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8666743-4dc5-79b8-56c7-23c05fc88d66@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 06:54:09 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: bcrl@...ck.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-aio@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: Save a few cycles in 'lookup_ioctx()'
Le 03/11/2021 à 22:31, Christophe JAILLET a écrit :
> Use 'percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu()' instead of 'percpu_ref_tryget_live()' to
> save a few cycles when it is known that the rcu lock is already
> taken/released.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> fs/aio.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
> index 9c81cf611d65..d189ea13e10a 100644
> --- a/fs/aio.c
> +++ b/fs/aio.c
> @@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ static struct kioctx *lookup_ioctx(unsigned long ctx_id)
> id = array_index_nospec(id, table->nr);
> ctx = rcu_dereference(table->table[id]);
> if (ctx && ctx->user_id == ctx_id) {
> - if (percpu_ref_tryget_live(&ctx->users))
> + if (percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu(&ctx->users))
> ret = ctx;
> }
> out:
Hi,
gentle reminder.
Is this patch useful?
When I first posted it, percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu() was really new.
Now it is part of linux since 5.16.
Saving a few cycles in a function with "lookup" in its name looks always
good to me.
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists