lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220812055710.357820-9-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:27:07 +0530
From:   "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, jvgediya.oss@...il.com,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v14 08/10] mm/demotion: Demote pages according to allocation fallback order

From: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@...il.com>

Currently, a higher tier node can only be demoted to selected nodes on the next
lower tier as defined by the demotion path. This strict demotion order does not
work in all use cases (e.g. some use cases may want to allow cross-socket
demotion to another node in the same demotion tier as a fallback when the
preferred demotion node is out of space). This demotion order is also
inconsistent with the page allocation fallback order when all the nodes in a
higher tier are out of space: The page allocation can fall back to any node from
any lower tier, whereas the demotion order doesn't allow that currently.

This patch adds support to get all the allowed demotion targets for a memory
tier. demote_page_list() function is now modified to utilize this allowed node
mask as the fallback allocation mask.

Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 12 ++++++++
 mm/memory-tiers.c            | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 mm/vmscan.c                  | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
index dd86323d2ba0..6fdff436c205 100644
--- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
+++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/nodemask.h>
 #include <linux/kref.h>
+#include <linux/mmzone.h>
 /*
  * Each tier cover a abstrace distance chunk size of 128
  */
@@ -35,11 +36,17 @@ void init_node_memory_type(int node, struct memory_dev_type *default_type);
 void clear_node_memory_type(int node, struct memory_dev_type *memtype);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
 int next_demotion_node(int node);
+void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets);
 #else
 static inline int next_demotion_node(int node)
 {
 	return NUMA_NO_NODE;
 }
+
+static inline void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets)
+{
+	*targets = NODE_MASK_NONE;
+}
 #endif
 
 #else
@@ -72,5 +79,10 @@ static inline int next_demotion_node(int node)
 {
 	return NUMA_NO_NODE;
 }
+
+static inline void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets)
+{
+	*targets = NODE_MASK_NONE;
+}
 #endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
 #endif  /* _LINUX_MEMORY_TIERS_H */
diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
index 9d53d4c14a5e..2db4b4116a28 100644
--- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
+++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>
 #include <linux/kobject.h>
 #include <linux/memory.h>
-#include <linux/mmzone.h>
 #include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
 
 #include "internal.h"
@@ -20,6 +19,8 @@ struct memory_tier {
 	 * adistance_start .. adistance_start + MEMTIER_CHUNK_SIZE
 	 */
 	int adistance_start;
+	/* All the nodes that are part of all the lower memory tiers. */
+	nodemask_t lower_tier_mask;
 };
 
 struct demotion_nodes {
@@ -156,6 +157,24 @@ static struct memory_tier *__node_get_memory_tier(int node)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
+void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets)
+{
+	struct memory_tier *memtier;
+
+	/*
+	 * pg_data_t.memtier updates includes a synchronize_rcu()
+	 * which ensures that we either find NULL or a valid memtier
+	 * in NODE_DATA. protect the access via rcu_read_lock();
+	 */
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	memtier = rcu_dereference(pgdat->memtier);
+	if (memtier)
+		*targets = memtier->lower_tier_mask;
+	else
+		*targets = NODE_MASK_NONE;
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
 /**
  * next_demotion_node() - Get the next node in the demotion path
  * @node: The starting node to lookup the next node
@@ -203,10 +222,19 @@ int next_demotion_node(int node)
 
 static void disable_all_demotion_targets(void)
 {
+	struct memory_tier *memtier;
 	int node;
 
-	for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY)
+	for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY) {
 		node_demotion[node].preferred = NODE_MASK_NONE;
+		/*
+		 * We are holding memory_tier_lock, it is safe
+		 * to access pgda->memtier.
+		 */
+		memtier = __node_get_memory_tier(node);
+		if (memtier)
+			memtier->lower_tier_mask = NODE_MASK_NONE;
+	}
 	/*
 	 * Ensure that the "disable" is visible across the system.
 	 * Readers will see either a combination of before+disable
@@ -238,7 +266,7 @@ static void establish_demotion_targets(void)
 	struct demotion_nodes *nd;
 	int target = NUMA_NO_NODE, node;
 	int distance, best_distance;
-	nodemask_t tier_nodes;
+	nodemask_t tier_nodes, lower_tier;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held_once(&memory_tier_lock);
 
@@ -286,6 +314,23 @@ static void establish_demotion_targets(void)
 			}
 		} while (1);
 	}
+	/*
+	 * Now build the lower_tier mask for each node collecting node mask from
+	 * all memory tier below it. This allows us to fallback demotion page
+	 * allocation to a set of nodes that is closer the above selected
+	 * perferred node.
+	 */
+	lower_tier = node_states[N_MEMORY];
+	list_for_each_entry(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
+		/*
+		 * Keep removing current tier from lower_tier nodes,
+		 * This will remove all nodes in current and above
+		 * memory tier from the lower_tier mask.
+		 */
+		tier_nodes = get_memtier_nodemask(memtier);
+		nodes_andnot(lower_tier, lower_tier, tier_nodes);
+		memtier->lower_tier_mask = lower_tier;
+	}
 }
 
 #else
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 224de380ac88..500b9054be18 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1521,21 +1521,34 @@ static void folio_check_dirty_writeback(struct folio *folio,
 		mapping->a_ops->is_dirty_writeback(folio, dirty, writeback);
 }
 
-static struct page *alloc_demote_page(struct page *page, unsigned long node)
+static struct page *alloc_demote_page(struct page *page, unsigned long private)
 {
-	struct migration_target_control mtc = {
-		/*
-		 * Allocate from 'node', or fail quickly and quietly.
-		 * When this happens, 'page' will likely just be discarded
-		 * instead of migrated.
-		 */
-		.gfp_mask = (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~__GFP_RECLAIM) |
-			    __GFP_THISNODE  | __GFP_NOWARN |
-			    __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_NOWAIT,
-		.nid = node
-	};
+	struct page *target_page;
+	nodemask_t *allowed_mask;
+	struct migration_target_control *mtc;
+
+	mtc = (struct migration_target_control *)private;
+
+	allowed_mask = mtc->nmask;
+	/*
+	 * make sure we allocate from the target node first also trying to
+	 * demote or reclaim pages from the target node via kswapd if we are
+	 * low on free memory on target node. If we don't do this and if
+	 * we have free memory on the slower(lower) memtier, we would start
+	 * allocating pages from slower(lower) memory tiers without even forcing
+	 * a demotion of cold pages from the target memtier. This can result
+	 * in the kernel placing hot pages in slower(lower) memory tiers.
+	 */
+	mtc->nmask = NULL;
+	mtc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_THISNODE;
+	target_page = alloc_migration_target(page, (unsigned long)mtc);
+	if (target_page)
+		return target_page;
 
-	return alloc_migration_target(page, (unsigned long)&mtc);
+	mtc->gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_THISNODE;
+	mtc->nmask = allowed_mask;
+
+	return alloc_migration_target(page, (unsigned long)mtc);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1548,6 +1561,19 @@ static unsigned int demote_page_list(struct list_head *demote_pages,
 {
 	int target_nid = next_demotion_node(pgdat->node_id);
 	unsigned int nr_succeeded;
+	nodemask_t allowed_mask;
+
+	struct migration_target_control mtc = {
+		/*
+		 * Allocate from 'node', or fail quickly and quietly.
+		 * When this happens, 'page' will likely just be discarded
+		 * instead of migrated.
+		 */
+		.gfp_mask = (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~__GFP_RECLAIM) | __GFP_NOWARN |
+			__GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_NOWAIT,
+		.nid = target_nid,
+		.nmask = &allowed_mask
+	};
 
 	if (list_empty(demote_pages))
 		return 0;
@@ -1555,10 +1581,12 @@ static unsigned int demote_page_list(struct list_head *demote_pages,
 	if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
 		return 0;
 
+	node_get_allowed_targets(pgdat, &allowed_mask);
+
 	/* Demotion ignores all cpuset and mempolicy settings */
 	migrate_pages(demote_pages, alloc_demote_page, NULL,
-			    target_nid, MIGRATE_ASYNC, MR_DEMOTION,
-			    &nr_succeeded);
+		      (unsigned long)&mtc, MIGRATE_ASYNC, MR_DEMOTION,
+		      &nr_succeeded);
 
 	if (current_is_kswapd())
 		__count_vm_events(PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD, nr_succeeded);
-- 
2.37.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ