[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1aa477b2-1d91-066e-5fcd-849ece62388d@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 09:23:10 +0300
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
"Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: riscv: Add DT binding documentation for
Renesas RZ/Five SoC and SMARC EVK
On 11/08/2022 18:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> At the DT validation level, I think the proper solution is to
> merge Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml and
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml into a single
> file under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/.
>
> What do other people think?
I am ok with it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists