linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: renesas,rzg2l: Document RZ/Five SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Aug 2022 09:47:50 +0100
From:   "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: renesas,rzg2l: Document RZ/Five SoC

Hi Rob,

Thank you for the review.

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 4:37 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 06:45:25PM +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > The CPG block on the RZ/Five SoC is almost identical to one found on the
> > RZ/G2UL SoC. "renesas,r9a07g043-cpg" compatible string will be used on
> > the RZ/Five SoC so to make this clear, update the comment to include
> > RZ/Five SoC.
>
> It's either the same part or it isn't. 'almost identical' doesn't sound
> like the former. Unless it's the former, it's a nak for me.
>
It's the latter.

> Litering the drivers with #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64/CONFIG_RISCV is not great
> either. That's not great for compile coverage and they have nothing to
> do with the architecture.
>
Geert any thoughts?

Cheers,
Prabhakar

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> > Note the driver changes [0] have been already queued for v5.20.
> >
> > [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/cover/
> > 20220622181723.13033-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com/
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/renesas,rzg2l-cpg.yaml | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/renesas,rzg2l-cpg.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/renesas,rzg2l-cpg.yaml
> > index d036675e0779..487f74cdc749 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/renesas,rzg2l-cpg.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/renesas,rzg2l-cpg.yaml
> > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ description: |
> >  properties:
> >    compatible:
> >      enum:
> > -      - renesas,r9a07g043-cpg # RZ/G2UL{Type-1,Type-2}
> > +      - renesas,r9a07g043-cpg # RZ/G2UL{Type-1,Type-2} and RZ/Five
> >        - renesas,r9a07g044-cpg # RZ/G2{L,LC}
> >        - renesas,r9a07g054-cpg # RZ/V2L
> >        - renesas,r9a09g011-cpg # RZ/V2M
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >