[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvYhoGdemyKEx++d@atomide.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 12:47:12 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] of: property: Simplify of_link_to_phandle()
Hi,
* Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> [220810 05:54]:
> The driver core now:
> - Has the parent device of a supplier pick up the consumers if the
> supplier never has a device created for it.
> - Ignores a supplier if the supplier has no parent device and will never
> be probed by a driver
>
> And already prevents creating a device link with the consumer as a
> supplier of a parent.
>
> So, we no longer need to find the "compatible" node of the supplier or
> do any other checks in of_link_to_phandle(). We simply need to make sure
> that the supplier is available in DT.
This patch fixes booting for me, so it should be applied as a fix and
tagged with:
Fixes: 5a46079a9645 ("PM: domains: Delete usage of driver_deferred_probe_check_state()")
If there are dependencies to the other patches in this series, it might
make sense to revert commit 5a46079a9645 instead.
Anyways, thanks for fixing the issue, for this patch:
Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
For the process, looks like the earlier series got merged despite the
issues reported. And we had non-booting Linux next for at least some SoCs
for weeks. And now we are about to have a non-booting -rc1 unless things
get fixed fast. Annoying glitches, sigh..
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists