linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] gpio-f7188x: Add GPIO support for Nuvoton NCT6116

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvY33D9YLm7/g14N@76cbfcf04d45>
Date:   Fri, 12 Aug 2022 13:22:04 +0200
From:   simon.guinot@...uanux.org
To:     Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        Sheng-Yuan Huang <syhuang3@...oton.com>,
        Tasanakorn Phaipool <tasanakorn@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] gpio-f7188x: Add GPIO support for Nuvoton NCT6116

On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 12:23:12PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote:
> Am Fri, 12 Aug 2022 10:43:03 +0200
> schrieb simon.guinot@...uanux.org:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 05:39:05PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote:
> > > Add GPIO support for Nuvoton NCT6116 chip. Nuvoton SuperIO chips are
> > > very similar to the ones from Fintek. In other subsystems they also
> > > share drivers and are called a family of drivers.
> > > 
> > > For the GPIO subsystem the only difference is that the direction
> > > bit is reversed and that there is only one data bit per pin. On the
> > > SuperIO level the logical device is another one.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpio-f7188x.c | 71
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 51
> > > insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-f7188x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-f7188x.c
> > > index 18a3147f5a42..7b05ecc611e9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-f7188x.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-f7188x.c
> > > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > >  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > >  /*
> > >   * GPIO driver for Fintek Super-I/O F71869, F71869A, F71882,
> > > F71889 and F81866
> > > + * and Nuvoton Super-I/O NCT6116D
> > >   *
> > >   * Copyright (C) 2010-2013 LaCie
> > >   *
> > > @@ -22,13 +23,12 @@
> > >  #define SIO_LDSEL		0x07	/* Logical device
> > > select */ #define SIO_DEVID		0x20	/* Device ID
> > > (2 bytes) */ #define SIO_DEVREV		0x22	/*
> > > Device revision */ -#define SIO_MANID		0x23	/*
> > > Fintek ID (2 bytes) */ 
> > > -#define SIO_LD_GPIO		0x06	/* GPIO logical
> > > device */ #define SIO_UNLOCK_KEY		0x87	/* Key
> > > to enable Super-I/O */ #define SIO_LOCK_KEY
> > > 0xAA	/* Key to disable Super-I/O */ 
> > > -#define SIO_FINTEK_ID		0x1934	/* Manufacturer
> > > ID */ +#define SIO_LD_GPIO_FINTEK	0x06	/* GPIO
> > > logical device */ +#define SIO_LD_GPIO_NUVOTON	0x07
> > > /* GPIO logical device */  
> > 
> > Please indulge me and add a new line here.
> 
> Mhh ... how about you write exactly how you would like to have that
> define block. So we do not have taste issues in the next round.

Sure. Considering the manufacturer IDs you have to keep and add, I would
go with your original approach (i.e. a section per manufacturer). But
I would add extra new lines and comments and use a sligthly different
namming for the LD_GPIO definitions.

/*
 * Super-I/O registers
 */
#define SIO_LDSEL               0x07    /* Logical device select */
#define SIO_DEVID               0x20    /* Device ID (2 bytes) */
#define SIO_DEVREV              0x22    /* Device revision */
#define SIO_MANID               0x23    /* Fintek ID (2 bytes) */

#define SIO_UNLOCK_KEY          0x87    /* Key to enable Super-I/O */
#define SIO_LOCK_KEY            0xAA    /* Key to disable Super-I/O */

/*
 * Fintek devices.
 */
#define SIO_FINTEK_ID           0x1934  /* Manufacturer ID */

#define SIO_F71869_ID           0x0814  /* F71869 chipset ID */
#define SIO_F71869A_ID          0x1007  /* F71869A chipset ID */
#define SIO_F71882_ID           0x0541  /* F71882 chipset ID */
#define SIO_F71889_ID           0x0909  /* F71889 chipset ID */
#define SIO_F71889A_ID          0x1005  /* F71889A chipset ID */
#define SIO_F81866_ID           0x1010  /* F81866 chipset ID */
#define SIO_F81804_ID           0x1502  /* F81804 chipset ID, same for
					   f81966 */ 
#define SIO_F81865_ID           0x0704  /* F81865 chipset ID */

#define SIO_FINTEK_LD_GPIO      0x06    /* GPIO logical device */

/*
 * Nuvoton devices.
 */
#define SIO_NUVOTON_ID          0xXXXX  /* Manufacturer ID */

#define SIO_NCT6116D_ID         0xD283  /* NCT6116D chipset ID */

#define SIO_NUVOTON_LD_GPIO     0x07    /* GPIO logical device */

Please, note it is not only a matter of taste. New lines and comments
are really helping the reader. Also, note that I am not asking for this
change, only suggesting it.

> 
> > >  #define SIO_F71869_ID		0x0814	/* F71869
> > > chipset ID */ #define SIO_F71869A_ID		0x1007
> > > /* F71869A chipset ID */ #define SIO_F71882_ID
> > > 0x0541	/* F71882 chipset ID */ @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> > >  #define SIO_F81866_ID		0x1010	/* F81866
> > > chipset ID */ #define SIO_F81804_ID		0x1502  /*
> > > F81804 chipset ID, same for f81966 */ #define SIO_F81865_ID
> > > 	0x0704	/* F81865 chipset ID */ -
> > > +#define SIO_NCT6116D_ID		0xD283  /* NCT6116D chipset
> > > ID */ 
> > 
> > ... snip ...
> > 
> > > @@ -485,12 +516,8 @@ static int __init f7188x_find(int addr, struct
> > > f7188x_sio *sio) return err;
> > >  
> > >  	err = -ENODEV;
> > > -	devid = superio_inw(addr, SIO_MANID);
> > > -	if (devid != SIO_FINTEK_ID) {
> > > -		pr_debug(DRVNAME ": Not a Fintek device at
> > > 0x%08x\n", addr);
> > > -		goto err;
> > > -	}  
> > 
> > Sorry for missing that at my first review. You can't remove this block
> > of code. This driver is poking around on the I2C bus, which is not
> > great. So we want to make sure as much as possible that we are
> > speaking to the right device.
> 
> Ok fair enough, we can make that more conservative and match the two
> manufacturers and also make sure that not one can bring a chip id that
> the other one uses for another chip.
> A v4 is coming earliest in 1.5 weeks.

Great. Thanks for your patience.

Simon

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)