[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24e251d7-f5db-5715-463d-333f5dfbfceb@arinc9.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:06:57 +0300
From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>,
René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: net: dsa: mediatek,mt7530: update
json-schema
On 12.08.2022 16:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/08/2022 16:41, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>> On 12.08.2022 10:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 12/08/2022 09:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 12/08/2022 01:09, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>>>>>> -patternProperties:
>>>>>>> - "^(ethernet-)?ports$":
>>>>>>> - type: object
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually four patches...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't find this change explained in commit msg. What is more, it looks
>>>>>> incorrect. All properties and patternProperties should be explained in
>>>>>> top-level part.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Defining such properties (with big piece of YAML) in each if:then: is no
>>>>>> readable.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't figure out another way. I need to require certain properties for
>>>>> a compatible string AND certain enum/const for certain properties which
>>>>> are inside patternProperties for "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$" by reading
>>>>> the compatible string.
>>>>
>>>> requiring properties is not equal to defining them and nothing stops you
>>>> from defining all properties top-level and requiring them in
>>>> allOf:if:then:patternProperties.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> If I put allOf:if:then under patternProperties, I can't do the latter.
>>>>
>>>> You can.
>>
>> Am I supposed to do something like this:
>>
>> patternProperties:
>> "^(ethernet-)?ports$":
>> type: object
>>
>> patternProperties:
>> "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
>> type: object
>> description: Ethernet switch ports
>>
>> unevaluatedProperties: false
>>
>> properties:
>> reg:
>> description:
>> Port address described must be 5 or 6 for CPU port and
>> from 0 to 5 for user ports.
>>
>> allOf:
>> - $ref: dsa-port.yaml#
>> - if:
>> properties:
>> label:
>> items:
>> - const: cpu
>> then:
>> allOf:
>> - if:
>> properties:
>
> Not really, this is absolutely unreadable.
>
> Usually the way it is handled is:
>
> patternProperties:
> "^(ethernet-)?ports$":
> type: object
>
> patternProperties:
> "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
> type: object
> description: Ethernet switch ports
> unevaluatedProperties: false
> ... regular stuff follows
>
> allOf:
> - if:
> properties:
> compatible:
> .....
> then:
> patternProperties:
> "^(ethernet-)?ports$":
> patternProperties:
> "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
> properties:
> reg:
> const: 5
>
>
> I admit that it is still difficult to parse, which could justify
> splitting to separate schema. Anyway the point of my comment was to
> define all properties in top level, not in allOf.
>
> allOf should be used to constrain these properties.
The problem is:
- only specific values of reg are allowed if label is cpu.
- only specific values of phy-mode are allowed if reg is 5 or 6.
This forces me to define properties under allOf:if:then. Splitting to
separate schema (per compatible string?) wouldn't help in this case.
I can split patternProperties to two sections, but I can't directly
define the reg property like you put above.
I can at least split mediatek,mt7531 to a separate schema to have less
patternProperties on a single binding.
What do you think?
Arınç
Powered by blists - more mailing lists