linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] PCI: mvebu: Fix endianity when accessing pci emul bridge members

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220812141115.24082-1-pali@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 12 Aug 2022 16:11:15 +0200
From:   Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] PCI: mvebu: Fix endianity when accessing pci emul bridge members

PCI emul bridge members iolimitupper, iobaseupper, memlimit and membase are
of type __le16, so correctly access these members via le16_to_cpu() macros.

Fixes: 4ded69473adb ("PCI: mvebu: Propagate errors when updating PCI_IO_BASE and PCI_MEM_BASE registers")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
* Fix parenthesis around le16_to_cpu() calls
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
index 0798ed182a96..b04b9bbe9217 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-mvebu.c
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_handle_iobase_change(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
 
 	/* Are the new iobase/iolimit values invalid? */
 	if (conf->iolimit < conf->iobase ||
-	    conf->iolimitupper < conf->iobaseupper)
+	    le16_to_cpu(conf->iolimitupper) < le16_to_cpu(conf->iobaseupper))
 		return mvebu_pcie_set_window(port, port->io_target, port->io_attr,
 					     &desired, &port->iowin);
 
@@ -599,10 +599,10 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_handle_iobase_change(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
 	 * is the CPU address.
 	 */
 	desired.remap = ((conf->iobase & 0xF0) << 8) |
-			(conf->iobaseupper << 16);
+			(le16_to_cpu(conf->iobaseupper) << 16);
 	desired.base = port->pcie->io.start + desired.remap;
 	desired.size = ((0xFFF | ((conf->iolimit & 0xF0) << 8) |
-			 (conf->iolimitupper << 16)) -
+			 (le16_to_cpu(conf->iolimitupper) << 16)) -
 			desired.remap) +
 		       1;
 
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_handle_membase_change(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
 	struct pci_bridge_emul_conf *conf = &port->bridge.conf;
 
 	/* Are the new membase/memlimit values invalid? */
-	if (conf->memlimit < conf->membase)
+	if (le16_to_cpu(conf->memlimit) < le16_to_cpu(conf->membase))
 		return mvebu_pcie_set_window(port, port->mem_target, port->mem_attr,
 					     &desired, &port->memwin);
 
@@ -626,8 +626,8 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_handle_membase_change(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
 	 * window to setup, according to the PCI-to-PCI bridge
 	 * specifications.
 	 */
-	desired.base = ((conf->membase & 0xFFF0) << 16);
-	desired.size = (((conf->memlimit & 0xFFF0) << 16) | 0xFFFFF) -
+	desired.base = ((le16_to_cpu(conf->membase) & 0xFFF0) << 16);
+	desired.size = (((le16_to_cpu(conf->memlimit) & 0xFFF0) << 16) | 0xFFFFF) -
 		       desired.base + 1;
 
 	return mvebu_pcie_set_window(port, port->mem_target, port->mem_attr, &desired,
-- 
2.20.1