linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: riscv: Add DT binding documentation for Renesas RZ/Five SoC and SMARC EVK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <mhng-16e843f9-aba2-41fe-9027-8362472fc7d7@palmer-mbp2014>
Date:   Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org
CC:     geert@...ux-m68k.org, biju.das.jz@...renesas.com,
        prabhakar.csengg@...il.com,
        prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com, magnus.damm@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, anup@...infault.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:     Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: riscv: Add DT binding documentation for Renesas RZ/Five SoC and SMARC EVK

On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 23:23:10 PDT (-0700), krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org wrote:
> On 11/08/2022 18:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> At the DT validation level, I think the proper solution is to
>> merge Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/renesas.yaml and
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/renesas.yaml into a single
>> file under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/.
>>
>> What do other people think?
>
> I am ok with it.

Seems reasonable to me too, but I pretty much always err on the side of 
keeping SOC stuff split out from the RISC-V stuff.  Just looking at 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/, it's pretty much all SOC stuff 
-- should we just move everything but cpus.yaml over?