linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2] net: introduce OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (ovpn-dco)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220812114427.05f7393a@hermes.local>
Date:   Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:44:27 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
Cc:     Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] net: introduce OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (ovpn-dco)

On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 21:34:33 +0300
Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com> wrote:

> What is the purpose of creating and destroying interfaces via RTNL,
> but performing all other operations using the dedicated netlink
> protocol?
> 
> RTNL interface usually implemented for some standalone interface
> types, e.g. VLAN, GRE, etc. Here we need a userspace application
> anyway to be able to use the network device to forward traffic, and
> the module implements the dedicated GENL protocol. So why not just
> introduce OVPN_CMD_NEW_IFACE and OVPN_CMD_DEL_IFACE commands to the
> GENL interface? It looks like this will simplify the userspace part by
> using the single GENL interface for any management operations.

RTNL is netlink. The standard way to create network devices should
be available with newlink message as in:

 # ip link add dev myvpn type ovpn <options>