linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] fw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGETcx-t0O0B+5i0FWwm5w2=ccOD5zVAaUvgQoP8PT9SOT_btw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:51:55 -0700
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] fw_devlink improvements

On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 2:49 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
>
> * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> [220810 05:54]:
> > Tony,
> >
> > This should handle the odd case of the child being the supplier of the
> > parent. Can you please give this a shot? I want to make sure the cycle
> > detection code handles this properly and treats it like it's NOT a cycle.
>
> Yup, this series works for me, so feel free to add:
>
> Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>

Thanks for testing!

Btw, out of curiosity, how many different boards did you test this on?
IIRC you had an issue only in one board, right? Not to say I didn't
break anything else, I'm just trying to see how much confidence we
have on this series so far. I'm hoping the rest of the folks I listed
in the email will get around to testing this series.

-Saravana

> I have some concerns though on how do we get a working -rc1 with the
> earlier series applied? See the comments in the last patch of this
> series.

I tried to reply, but not sure if it helps. We'll continue the discussion there.

-Saravana