[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f2fe1889-e381-e29a-14c7-3e57c4488dca@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 14:00:36 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, osandov@...com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] blk-mq: fix io hung due to missing commit_rqs
在 2022/07/29 14:35, Yu Kuai 写道:
> Hi, Jens
>
> Can you please consider this patch for v5.20?
>
friendly ping ...
> Thanks,
> Kuai
>
> 在 2022/07/27 11:08, Ming Lei 写道:
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 08:22:24PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>>
>>> Currently, in virtio_scsi, if 'bd->last' is not set to true while
>>> dispatching request, such io will stay in driver's queue, and driver
>>> will wait for block layer to dispatch more rqs. However, if block
>>> layer failed to dispatch more rq, it should trigger commit_rqs to
>>> inform driver.
>>>
>>> There is a problem in blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly() that commit_rqs
>>> won't be called:
>>>
>>> // assume that queue_depth is set to 1, list contains two rq
>>> blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly
>>> blk_mq_request_issue_directly
>>> // dispatch first rq
>>> // last is false
>>> __blk_mq_try_issue_directly
>>> blk_mq_get_dispatch_budget
>>> // succeed to get first budget
>>> __blk_mq_issue_directly
>>> scsi_queue_rq
>>> cmd->flags |= SCMD_LAST
>>> virtscsi_queuecommand
>>> kick = (sc->flags & SCMD_LAST) != 0
>>> // kick is false, first rq won't issue to disk
>>> queued++
>>>
>>> blk_mq_request_issue_directly
>>> // dispatch second rq
>>> __blk_mq_try_issue_directly
>>> blk_mq_get_dispatch_budget
>>> // failed to get second budget
>>> ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE
>>> blk_mq_request_bypass_insert
>>> // errors is still 0
>>>
>>> if (!list_empty(list) || errors && ...)
>>> // won't pass, commit_rqs won't be called
>>>
>>> In this situation, first rq relied on second rq to dispatch, while
>>> second rq relied on first rq to complete, thus they will both hung.
>>>
>>> Fix the problem by also treat 'BLK_STS_*RESOURCE' as 'errors' since
>>> it means that request is not queued successfully.
>>>
>>> Same problem exists in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(), 'BLK_STS_*RESOURCE'
>>> can't be treated as 'errors' here, fix the problem by calling
>>> commit_rqs if queue_rq return 'BLK_STS_*RESOURCE'.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d666ba98f849 ("blk-mq: add mq_ops->commit_rqs()")
>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ming
>>
>> .
>>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists