[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvjEIjXg7KxtTT/0@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 11:45:06 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Khalid Masum <khalid.masum.92@...il.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Soundwire: Initialize multi_link with fwnode props
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 02:04:15PM +0600, Khalid Masum wrote:
> According to the TODO, In sw_bus_master_add, bus->multi_link is to be
> populated with properties from FW node props. Make this happen by
> creating a new fwnode_handle flag FWNODE_FLAG_MULTI_LINKED and use
> the flag to store the multi_link value from intel_link_startup. Use
> this flag to initialize bus->multi_link.
>
> Signed-off-by: Khalid Masum <khalid.masum.92@...il.com>
> ---
> I do not think adding a new flag for fwnode_handle is a good idea.
> So, what would be the best way to initialize bus->multilink with
> fwnode props?
>
> -- Khalid Masum
>
> drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/soundwire/intel.c | 1 +
> include/linux/fwnode.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> index a2bfb0434a67..80df1672c60b 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> @@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ int sdw_bus_master_add(struct sdw_bus *bus, struct device *parent,
>
> /*
> * Initialize multi_link flag
> - * TODO: populate this flag by reading property from FW node
> */
> - bus->multi_link = false;
> + bus->multi_link = (fwnode->flags & FWNODE_FLAG_MULTI_LINKED)
> + == FWNODE_FLAG_MULTI_LINKED;
> if (bus->ops->read_prop) {
> ret = bus->ops->read_prop(bus);
> if (ret < 0) {
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> index 505c5ef061e3..034d1c523ddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> @@ -1347,6 +1347,7 @@ int intel_link_startup(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev)
> */
> bus->multi_link = true;
> bus->hw_sync_min_links = 1;
> + dev->fwnode->flags |= FWNODE_FLAG_MULTI_LINKED;
> }
>
> /* Initialize shim, controller */
> diff --git a/include/linux/fwnode.h b/include/linux/fwnode.h
> index 9a81c4410b9f..446a52744953 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fwnode.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fwnode.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct device;
> #define FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE BIT(1)
> #define FWNODE_FLAG_INITIALIZED BIT(2)
> #define FWNODE_FLAG_NEEDS_CHILD_BOUND_ON_ADD BIT(3)
> +#define FWNODE_FLAG_MULTI_LINKED BIT(4)
What does this commit actually change?
Did you test this on real hardware?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists