[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220814151512.097c7779@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 15:15:12 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>
Cc: linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] iio: pressure: bmp280: Add support for BMP380
sensor family
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 13:55:52 +0200
Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com> wrote:
> Adds compatibility with the new generation of this sensor, the BMP380
>
> Includes basic sensor initialization to do pressure and temp
> measurements and allows tuning oversampling settings for each channel.
>
> The compensation algorithms are adapted from the device datasheet and
> the repository https://github.com/BoschSensortec/BMP3-Sensor-API
>
> Signed-off-by: Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>
One additional comment from me inline.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> }
> @@ -1124,6 +1471,13 @@ int bmp280_common_probe(struct device *dev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + /* BMP3xx requires soft-reset as part of initialization */
> + if (chip_id == BMP380_CHIP_ID) {
I'd prefer this to be based on a flag in chip_info so that we can
trivially add it to future devices by just setting that flag for the
chip_info added for the new device.
> + ret = bmp380_cmd(data, BMP380_CMD_SOFT_RESET);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> ret = data->chip_info->chip_config(data);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists