[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvhVktaSeK0vLmhB@xhacker>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 09:53:22 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@...onical.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] use static key to optimize pgtable_l4_enabled
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 07:50:57PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> The pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled check sits at hot code path, performance
> is impacted a lot. Since pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled isn't changed after
> boot, so static key can be used to solve the performance issue[1].
>
> An unified way static key was introduced in [2], but it only targets
> riscv isa extension. We dunno whether SV48 and SV57 will be considered
> as isa extension, so the unified solution isn't used for
> pgtable_l4[l5]_enabled now.
>
> patch1 fixes a NULL pointer deference if static key is used a bit earlier.
> patch2 uses the static key to optimize pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled.
>
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-December/011164.html
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220517184453.3558-1-jszhang@kernel.org/T/#t
Hi Palmer,
I see part1 and part2 were sent out...
What I can do to make this series merged for 6.0-rc1? I'm afraid this series
may miss anothe round of merge window again.
Thanks in advance
>
> Since v5:
> - Use DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE
>
> Since v4:
> - rebased on v5.19-rcN
> - collect Reviewed-by tags
> - Fix kernel panic issue if SPARSEMEM is enabled by moving the
> riscv_finalise_pgtable_lx() after sparse_init()
>
> Since v3:
> - fix W=1 call to undeclared function 'static_branch_likely' error
>
> Since v2:
> - move the W=1 warning fix to a separate patch
> - move the unified way to use static key to a new patch series.
>
> Since v1:
> - Add a W=1 warning fix
> - Fix W=1 error
> - Based on v5.18-rcN, since SV57 support is added, so convert
> pgtable_l5_enabled as well.
>
> Jisheng Zhang (2):
> riscv: move sbi_init() earlier before jump_label_init()
> riscv: turn pgtable_l4|[l5]_enabled to static key for RV64
>
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 16 ++++----
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-32.h | 3 ++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable-64.h | 60 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +--
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 4 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c | 16 ++++----
> 8 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists