linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 34/56] scsi: ufs: ufs-exynos: Change ufs phy control sequence

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 14 Aug 2022 11:30:04 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        alim.akhtar@...sung.com, beanhuo@...ron.com, bvanassche@....org,
        peter.wang@...iatek.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 34/56] scsi: ufs: ufs-exynos: Change ufs phy control sequence

From: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>

[ Upstream commit 3d73b200f9893d8f5ba5d105e8b69c8d16744fa2 ]

Since commit 1599069a62c6 ("phy: core: Warn when phy_power_on is called
before phy_init"), the following warning has been reported:

	phy_power_on was called before phy_init

To address this, we need to remove phy_power_on from exynos_ufs_phy_init()
and move it after phy_init. phy_power_off and phy_exit are also necessary
in exynos_ufs_remove().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220706020255.151177-4-chanho61.park@samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c
index 474a4a064a68..3ff9bd77f2c6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c
@@ -909,9 +909,13 @@ static int exynos_ufs_phy_init(struct exynos_ufs *ufs)
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: phy init failed, ret = %d\n",
 			__func__, ret);
-		goto out_exit_phy;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
+	ret = phy_power_on(generic_phy);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_exit_phy;
+
 	return 0;
 
 out_exit_phy:
@@ -1173,10 +1177,6 @@ static int exynos_ufs_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	ret = phy_power_on(ufs->phy);
-	if (ret)
-		goto phy_off;
-
 	exynos_ufs_priv_init(hba, ufs);
 
 	if (ufs->drv_data->drv_init) {
@@ -1194,8 +1194,6 @@ static int exynos_ufs_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	exynos_ufs_config_smu(ufs);
 	return 0;
 
-phy_off:
-	phy_power_off(ufs->phy);
 out:
 	hba->priv = NULL;
 	return ret;
@@ -1513,9 +1511,14 @@ static int exynos_ufs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static int exynos_ufs_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct ufs_hba *hba =  platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct exynos_ufs *ufs = ufshcd_get_variant(hba);
 
 	pm_runtime_get_sync(&(pdev)->dev);
 	ufshcd_remove(hba);
+
+	phy_power_off(ufs->phy);
+	phy_exit(ufs->phy);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.35.1