lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 14 Aug 2022 12:19:06 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com, daniel.baluta@....com,
        perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, rander.wang@...el.com,
        guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com,
        sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.19 13/48] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-ipc: Do not process IPC reply before firmware boot

From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 499cc881b09c8283ab5e75b0d6d21cb427722161 ]

It is not yet clear, but it is possible to create a firmware so broken
that it will send a reply message before a FW_READY message (it is not
yet clear if FW_READY will arrive later).
Since the reply_data is allocated only after the FW_READY message, this
will lead to a NULL pointer dereference if not filtered out.

The issue was reported with IPC4 firmware but the same condition is present
for IPC3.

Reported-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220712122357.31282-3-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-ipc.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-ipc.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-ipc.c
index f08011249955..65e688f749ea 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-ipc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda-ipc.c
@@ -148,17 +148,23 @@ irqreturn_t hda_dsp_ipc4_irq_thread(int irq, void *context)
 
 		if (primary & SOF_IPC4_MSG_DIR_MASK) {
 			/* Reply received */
-			struct sof_ipc4_msg *data = sdev->ipc->msg.reply_data;
+			if (likely(sdev->fw_state == SOF_FW_BOOT_COMPLETE)) {
+				struct sof_ipc4_msg *data = sdev->ipc->msg.reply_data;
 
-			data->primary = primary;
-			data->extension = extension;
+				data->primary = primary;
+				data->extension = extension;
 
-			spin_lock_irq(&sdev->ipc_lock);
+				spin_lock_irq(&sdev->ipc_lock);
 
-			snd_sof_ipc_get_reply(sdev);
-			snd_sof_ipc_reply(sdev, data->primary);
+				snd_sof_ipc_get_reply(sdev);
+				snd_sof_ipc_reply(sdev, data->primary);
 
-			spin_unlock_irq(&sdev->ipc_lock);
+				spin_unlock_irq(&sdev->ipc_lock);
+			} else {
+				dev_dbg_ratelimited(sdev->dev,
+						    "IPC reply before FW_READY: %#x|%#x\n",
+						    primary, extension);
+			}
 		} else {
 			/* Notification received */
 
@@ -225,16 +231,21 @@ irqreturn_t hda_dsp_ipc_irq_thread(int irq, void *context)
 		 * place, the message might not yet be marked as expecting a
 		 * reply.
 		 */
-		spin_lock_irq(&sdev->ipc_lock);
+		if (likely(sdev->fw_state == SOF_FW_BOOT_COMPLETE)) {
+			spin_lock_irq(&sdev->ipc_lock);
 
-		/* handle immediate reply from DSP core */
-		hda_dsp_ipc_get_reply(sdev);
-		snd_sof_ipc_reply(sdev, msg);
+			/* handle immediate reply from DSP core */
+			hda_dsp_ipc_get_reply(sdev);
+			snd_sof_ipc_reply(sdev, msg);
 
-		/* set the done bit */
-		hda_dsp_ipc_dsp_done(sdev);
+			/* set the done bit */
+			hda_dsp_ipc_dsp_done(sdev);
 
-		spin_unlock_irq(&sdev->ipc_lock);
+			spin_unlock_irq(&sdev->ipc_lock);
+		} else {
+			dev_dbg_ratelimited(sdev->dev, "IPC reply before FW_READY: %#x\n",
+					    msg);
+		}
 
 		ipc_irq = true;
 	}
-- 
2.35.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ