lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <a4ea2e705512b63fcab0863502c7bb3c7b42f982.1660454970.git.remckee0@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 14 Aug 2022 01:06:18 -0500
From:   Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] memblock tests: add generic NUMA tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid*

Add tests for memblock_alloc_try_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw()
where the simulated physical memory is set up with multiple NUMA nodes.
Additionally, two of these tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. All tests are
run for both top-down and bottom-up allocation directions.

The tested scenarios are:

Range unrestricted:
- region cannot be allocated:
      + none of the nodes have enough memory to allocate the region

Range restricted:
- region can be allocated in the specific node requested without dropping
  min_addr:
      + the range fully overlaps with the node, and there are adjacent
        reserved regions
- region cannot be allocated:
      + nid is set to NUMA_NO_NODE and the total range can fit the region,
        but the range is split between two nodes and everything else is
        reserved

Signed-off-by: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@...il.com>
---
 tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c | 203 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 203 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c
index 112cd8018d7c..9cbc95ebe07d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c
+++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c
@@ -2390,6 +2390,179 @@ static int alloc_try_nid_numa_bottom_up_no_overlap_high_check(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * A test that tries to allocate a memory region in a specific NUMA node that
+ * does not have enough memory to allocate a region of the requested size.
+ * Additionally, none of the nodes have enough memory to allocate the region:
+ *
+ * +-----------------------------------+
+ * |                new                |
+ * +-----------------------------------+
+ *     |-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------|
+ *     | node0 | node1 | node2 | node3 | node4 | node5 | node6 | node7 |
+ *     +-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
+ *
+ * Expect no allocation to happen.
+ */
+static int alloc_try_nid_generic_numa_large_region_check(void)
+{
+	int nid_req = 3;
+	void *allocated_ptr = NULL;
+
+	PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+	phys_addr_t size = SZ_8K * MEM_FACTOR;
+	phys_addr_t min_addr;
+	phys_addr_t max_addr;
+
+	setup_numa_memblock();
+
+	min_addr = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
+	max_addr = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
+
+	allocated_ptr = run_memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
+						   min_addr, max_addr, nid_req);
+	ASSERT_EQ(allocated_ptr, NULL);
+
+	test_pass_pop();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * A test that tries to allocate memory within min_addr and max_addr range when
+ * there are two reserved regions at the borders. The requested node starts at
+ * min_addr and ends at max_addr and is the same size as the region to be
+ * allocated:
+ *
+ *                     min_addr
+ *                     |                       max_addr
+ *                     |                       |
+ *                     v                       v
+ *  |      +-----------+-----------------------+-----------------------|
+ *  |      |   node5   |       requested       |         node7         |
+ *  +------+-----------+-----------------------+-----------------------+
+ *                     +                       +
+ *  |             +----+-----------------------+----+                  |
+ *  |             | r2 |          new          | r1 |                  |
+ *  +-------------+----+-----------------------+----+------------------+
+ *
+ * Expect to merge all of the regions into one. The region counter and total
+ * size fields get updated.
+ */
+static int alloc_try_nid_numa_reserved_full_merge_generic_check(void)
+{
+	int nid_req = 6;
+	int nid_next = nid_req + 1;
+	struct memblock_region *new_rgn = &memblock.reserved.regions[0];
+	struct memblock_region *req_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_req];
+	struct memblock_region *next_node = &memblock.memory.regions[nid_next];
+	void *allocated_ptr = NULL;
+	struct region r1, r2;
+
+	PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+	phys_addr_t size = req_node->size;
+	phys_addr_t total_size;
+	phys_addr_t max_addr;
+	phys_addr_t min_addr;
+
+	setup_numa_memblock();
+
+	r1.base = next_node->base;
+	r1.size = SZ_128;
+
+	r2.size = SZ_128;
+	r2.base = r1.base - (size + r2.size);
+
+	total_size = r1.size + r2.size + size;
+	min_addr = r2.base + r2.size;
+	max_addr = r1.base;
+
+	memblock_reserve(r1.base, r1.size);
+	memblock_reserve(r2.base, r2.size);
+
+	allocated_ptr = run_memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
+						   min_addr, max_addr, nid_req);
+
+	ASSERT_NE(allocated_ptr, NULL);
+	verify_mem_content(allocated_ptr, size);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->size, total_size);
+	ASSERT_EQ(new_rgn->base, r2.base);
+
+	ASSERT_LE(new_rgn->base, req_node->base);
+	ASSERT_LE(region_end(req_node), region_end(new_rgn));
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.cnt, 1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(memblock.reserved.total_size, total_size);
+
+	test_pass_pop();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * A test that tries to allocate memory within min_addr and max_add range,
+ * where the total range can fit the region, but it is split between two nodes
+ * and everything else is reserved. Additionally, nid is set to NUMA_NO_NODE
+ * instead of requesting a specific node:
+ *
+ *                         +-----------+
+ *                         |    new    |
+ *                         +-----------+
+ *  |      +---------------------+-----------|
+ *  |      |      prev node      | next node |
+ *  +------+---------------------+-----------+
+ *                         +           +
+ *  |----------------------+           +-----|
+ *  |          r1          |           |  r2 |
+ *  +----------------------+-----------+-----+
+ *                         ^           ^
+ *                         |           |
+ *                         |           max_addr
+ *                         |
+ *                         min_addr
+ *
+ * Expect no allocation to happen.
+ */
+static int alloc_try_nid_numa_split_all_reserved_generic_check(void)
+{
+	void *allocated_ptr = NULL;
+	struct memblock_region *next_node = &memblock.memory.regions[7];
+	struct region r1, r2;
+
+	PREFIX_PUSH();
+
+	phys_addr_t size = SZ_256;
+	phys_addr_t max_addr;
+	phys_addr_t min_addr;
+
+	setup_numa_memblock();
+
+	r2.base = next_node->base + SZ_128;
+	r2.size = memblock_end_of_DRAM() - r2.base;
+
+	r1.size = MEM_SIZE - (r2.size + size);
+	r1.base = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
+
+	min_addr = r1.base + r1.size;
+	max_addr = r2.base;
+
+	memblock_reserve(r1.base, r1.size);
+	memblock_reserve(r2.base, r2.size);
+
+	allocated_ptr = run_memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES,
+						   min_addr, max_addr,
+						   NUMA_NO_NODE);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(allocated_ptr, NULL);
+
+	test_pass_pop();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /* Test case wrappers for NUMA tests */
 static int alloc_try_nid_numa_simple_check(void)
 {
@@ -2501,6 +2674,33 @@ static int alloc_try_nid_numa_no_overlap_high_check(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int alloc_try_nid_numa_large_region_check(void)
+{
+	test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__);
+	run_top_down(alloc_try_nid_generic_numa_large_region_check);
+	run_bottom_up(alloc_try_nid_generic_numa_large_region_check);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int alloc_try_nid_numa_reserved_full_merge_check(void)
+{
+	test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__);
+	run_top_down(alloc_try_nid_numa_reserved_full_merge_generic_check);
+	run_bottom_up(alloc_try_nid_numa_reserved_full_merge_generic_check);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int alloc_try_nid_numa_split_all_reserved_check(void)
+{
+	test_print("\tRunning %s...\n", __func__);
+	run_top_down(alloc_try_nid_numa_split_all_reserved_generic_check);
+	run_bottom_up(alloc_try_nid_numa_split_all_reserved_generic_check);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int __memblock_alloc_nid_numa_checks(void)
 {
 	test_print("Running %s NUMA tests...\n",
@@ -2517,6 +2717,9 @@ int __memblock_alloc_nid_numa_checks(void)
 	alloc_try_nid_numa_no_overlap_split_check();
 	alloc_try_nid_numa_no_overlap_low_check();
 	alloc_try_nid_numa_no_overlap_high_check();
+	alloc_try_nid_numa_large_region_check();
+	alloc_try_nid_numa_reserved_full_merge_check();
+	alloc_try_nid_numa_split_all_reserved_check();
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ