linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 8/8] MIPS: tlbex: Explicitly compare _PAGE_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220814163041.2399552-8-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 14 Aug 2022 12:30:41 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
        macro@...am.me.uk, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 8/8] MIPS: tlbex: Explicitly compare _PAGE_NO_EXEC against 0

From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>

[ Upstream commit 74de14fe05dd6b151d73cb0c73c8ec874cbdcde6 ]

When CONFIG_XPA is enabled, Clang warns:

  arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c:629:24: error: converting the result of '<<' to a boolean; did you mean '(1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT) != 0'? [-Werror,-Wint-in-bool-context]
          if (cpu_has_rixi && !!_PAGE_NO_EXEC) {
                              ^
  arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-bits.h:174:28: note: expanded from macro '_PAGE_NO_EXEC'
  # define _PAGE_NO_EXEC          (1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT)
                                     ^
  arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c:2568:24: error: converting the result of '<<' to a boolean; did you mean '(1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT) != 0'? [-Werror,-Wint-in-bool-context]
          if (!cpu_has_rixi || !_PAGE_NO_EXEC) {
                                ^
  arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-bits.h:174:28: note: expanded from macro '_PAGE_NO_EXEC'
  # define _PAGE_NO_EXEC          (1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT)
                                     ^
  2 errors generated.

_PAGE_NO_EXEC can be '0' or '1 << _PAGE_NO_EXEC_SHIFT' depending on the
build and runtime configuration, which is what the negation operators
are trying to convey. To silence the warning, explicitly compare against
0 so the result of the '<<' operator is not implicitly converted to a
boolean.

According to its documentation, GCC enables -Wint-in-bool-context with
-Wall but this warning is not visible when building the same
configuration with GCC. It appears GCC only warns when compiling C++,
not C, although the documentation makes no note of this:
https://godbolt.org/z/x39q3brxf

Reported-by: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c b/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c
index f625fd20b21e..65fed205383e 100644
--- a/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c
+++ b/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c
@@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ static __maybe_unused void build_convert_pte_to_entrylo(u32 **p,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (cpu_has_rixi && !!_PAGE_NO_EXEC) {
+	if (cpu_has_rixi && _PAGE_NO_EXEC != 0) {
 		if (fill_includes_sw_bits) {
 			UASM_i_ROTR(p, reg, reg, ilog2(_PAGE_GLOBAL));
 		} else {
@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static void check_pabits(void)
 	unsigned long entry;
 	unsigned pabits, fillbits;
 
-	if (!cpu_has_rixi || !_PAGE_NO_EXEC) {
+	if (!cpu_has_rixi || _PAGE_NO_EXEC == 0) {
 		/*
 		 * We'll only be making use of the fact that we can rotate bits
 		 * into the fill if the CPU supports RIXI, so don't bother
-- 
2.35.1