[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220815090824.340d44bb@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 09:08:24 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: broonie@...nel.org, Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@...il.com>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Antonio Terceiro <antonio.terceiro@...aro.org>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Boris-Chengbiao Zhou <bobo1239@....de>,
Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>,
Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@...snowski.pl>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Douglas Su <d0u9.su@...look.com>, Finn Behrens <me@...enk.de>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Miguel Cano <macanroj@...il.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>,
Tiago Lam <tiagolam@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with the kbuild tree
Hi all,
On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 00:38:44 +0100 broonie@...nel.org wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rust tree got a conflict in:
>
> Makefile
>
> between commit:
>
> a6036a41bffba ("kbuild: drop support for CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE_O3")
>
> from the kbuild tree and commit:
>
> fe24902ba8765 ("Kbuild: add Rust support")
>
> from the rust tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc Makefile
> index 60a7e3e8b4787,cd1d545f316bc..0000000000000
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@@ -758,10 -819,20 +822,17 @@@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warn
>
> ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O2
> + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Copt-level=2
> -else ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE_O3
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -O3
> -KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Copt-level=3
> else ifdef CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Os
> + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Copt-level=s
> endif
>
> + # Always set `debug-assertions` and `overflow-checks` because their default
> + # depends on `opt-level` and `debug-assertions`, respectively.
> + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Cdebug-assertions=$(if $(CONFIG_RUST_DEBUG_ASSERTIONS),y,n)
> + KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Coverflow-checks=$(if $(CONFIG_RUST_OVERFLOW_CHECKS),y,n)
> +
> # Tell gcc to never replace conditional load with a non-conditional one
> ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC
> # gcc-10 renamed --param=allow-store-data-races=0 to
> @@@ -1098,7 -1178,7 +1178,8 @@@ export MODULES_NSDEPS := $(extmod_prefi
> ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> core-y += kernel/ certs/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ security/ crypto/
> core-$(CONFIG_BLOCK) += block/
> +core-$(CONFIG_IO_URING) += io_uring/
> + core-$(CONFIG_RUST) += rust/
>
> vmlinux-dirs := $(patsubst %/,%,$(filter %/, \
> $(core-y) $(core-m) $(drivers-y) $(drivers-m) \
This is now a conflict between the rust tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists