lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220815180346.035505502@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:57:29 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
        Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@...e.de>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 205/779] arm64: tegra: Mark BPMP channels as no-memory-wc

From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>

[ Upstream commit 61192a9d8a6367ae1b8234876941b037910a2459 ]

The Tegra SYSRAM contains regions access to which is restricted to
certain hardware blocks on the system, and speculative accesses to
those will cause issues.

Patch 'misc: sram: Only map reserved areas in Tegra SYSRAM' attempted
to resolve this by only mapping the regions specified in the device
tree on the assumption that there are no such restricted areas within
the 64K-aligned area of memory that contains the memory we wish to map.

Turns out this assumption is wrong, as there are such areas above the
4K pages described in the device trees. As such, we need to use the
bigger hammer that is no-memory-wc, which causes the memory to be
mapped as Device memory to which speculative accesses are disallowed.

As such, the previous patch in the series,
  'firmware: tegra: bpmp: do only aligned access to IPC memory area',
is required with this patch to make the BPMP driver only issue aligned
memory accesses as those are also required with Device memory.

Fixes: fec29bf04994 ("misc: sram: Only map reserved areas in Tegra SYSRAM")
Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi | 1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi | 1 +
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
index 8354512d7b1c..5b0bc9aa1a42 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186.dtsi
@@ -1583,6 +1583,7 @@ sram@...00000 {
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <1>;
 		ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x30000000 0x50000>;
+		no-memory-wc;
 
 		cpu_bpmp_tx: sram@...00 {
 			reg = <0x4e000 0x1000>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi
index a56fb83839a4..ca71b71d801a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi
@@ -2249,6 +2249,7 @@ sram@...00000 {
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <1>;
 		ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x40000000 0x50000>;
+		no-memory-wc;
 
 		cpu_bpmp_tx: sram@...00 {
 			reg = <0x4e000 0x1000>;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
index 144a7eb699a7..2b4784572220 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ sram@...00000 {
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <1>;
 		ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x40000000 0x80000>;
+		no-memory-wc;
 
 		cpu_bpmp_tx: sram@...00 {
 			reg = <0x70000 0x1000>;
-- 
2.35.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ