[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx-k+ca5uG42XvW5yiK8RWDYfeRs9va5boqnp33s45AGRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:23:09 -0700
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] fw_devlink improvements
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 3:33 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
>
> * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> [220813 00:45]:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 2:49 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > * Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> [220810 05:54]:
> > > > Tony,
> > > >
> > > > This should handle the odd case of the child being the supplier of the
> > > > parent. Can you please give this a shot? I want to make sure the cycle
> > > > detection code handles this properly and treats it like it's NOT a cycle.
> > >
> > > Yup, this series works for me, so feel free to add:
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> >
> > Thanks for testing!
> >
> > Btw, out of curiosity, how many different boards did you test this on?
> > IIRC you had an issue only in one board, right? Not to say I didn't
> > break anything else, I'm just trying to see how much confidence we
> > have on this series so far. I'm hoping the rest of the folks I listed
> > in the email will get around to testing this series.
>
> Sorry if I was not clear earlier. The issue affects several generations
> of TI 32-bit SoCs at least, not just one board.
But this series fixes the issues for all of them or are you still
seeing some broken boot with this series?
-Saravana
>
> > > I have some concerns though on how do we get a working -rc1 with the
> > > earlier series applied? See the comments in the last patch of this
> > > series.
> >
> > I tried to reply, but not sure if it helps. We'll continue the discussion there.
>
> Ack.
>
> Tony
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@...roid.com.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists