linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.18 0014/1095] wifi: mac80211_hwsim: fix race condition in pending packet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:50:13 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jeongik Cha <jeongik@...gle.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.18 0014/1095] wifi: mac80211_hwsim: fix race condition in pending packet

From: Jeongik Cha <jeongik@...gle.com>

commit 4ee186fa7e40ae06ebbfbad77e249e3746e14114 upstream.

A pending packet uses a cookie as an unique key, but it can be duplicated
because it didn't use atomic operators.

And also, a pending packet can be null in hwsim_tx_info_frame_received_nl
due to race condition with mac80211_hwsim_stop.

For this,
 * Use an atomic type and operator for a cookie
 * Add a lock around the loop for pending packets

Signed-off-by: Jeongik Cha <jeongik@...gle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220704084354.3556326-1-jeongik@google.com
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c |   14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mac80211_hwsim.c
@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ struct mac80211_hwsim_data {
 	bool ps_poll_pending;
 	struct dentry *debugfs;
 
-	uintptr_t pending_cookie;
+	atomic64_t pending_cookie;
 	struct sk_buff_head pending;	/* packets pending */
 	/*
 	 * Only radios in the same group can communicate together (the
@@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ static void mac80211_hwsim_tx_frame_nl(s
 	int i;
 	struct hwsim_tx_rate tx_attempts[IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES];
 	struct hwsim_tx_rate_flag tx_attempts_flags[IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES];
-	uintptr_t cookie;
+	u64 cookie;
 
 	if (data->ps != PS_DISABLED)
 		hdr->frame_control |= cpu_to_le16(IEEE80211_FCTL_PM);
@@ -1416,8 +1416,7 @@ static void mac80211_hwsim_tx_frame_nl(s
 		goto nla_put_failure;
 
 	/* We create a cookie to identify this skb */
-	data->pending_cookie++;
-	cookie = data->pending_cookie;
+	cookie = (u64)atomic64_inc_return(&data->pending_cookie);
 	info->rate_driver_data[0] = (void *)cookie;
 	if (nla_put_u64_64bit(skb, HWSIM_ATTR_COOKIE, cookie, HWSIM_ATTR_PAD))
 		goto nla_put_failure;
@@ -4080,6 +4079,7 @@ static int hwsim_tx_info_frame_received_
 	const u8 *src;
 	unsigned int hwsim_flags;
 	int i;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	bool found = false;
 
 	if (!info->attrs[HWSIM_ATTR_ADDR_TRANSMITTER] ||
@@ -4107,18 +4107,20 @@ static int hwsim_tx_info_frame_received_
 	}
 
 	/* look for the skb matching the cookie passed back from user */
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&data2->pending.lock, flags);
 	skb_queue_walk_safe(&data2->pending, skb, tmp) {
 		u64 skb_cookie;
 
 		txi = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
-		skb_cookie = (u64)(uintptr_t)txi->rate_driver_data[0];
+		skb_cookie = (u64)txi->rate_driver_data[0];
 
 		if (skb_cookie == ret_skb_cookie) {
-			skb_unlink(skb, &data2->pending);
+			__skb_unlink(skb, &data2->pending);
 			found = true;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data2->pending.lock, flags);
 
 	/* not found */
 	if (!found)