linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 741/779] ext4: update s_overhead_clusters in the superblock during an on-line resize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220815180409.123189877@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 20:06:25 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
        stable@...nel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 741/779] ext4: update s_overhead_clusters in the superblock during an on-line resize

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>

[ Upstream commit de394a86658ffe4e89e5328fd4993abfe41b7435 ]

When doing an online resize, the on-disk superblock on-disk wasn't
updated.  This means that when the file system is unmounted and
remounted, and the on-disk overhead value is non-zero, this would
result in the results of statfs(2) to be incorrect.

This was partially fixed by Commits 10b01ee92df5 ("ext4: fix overhead
calculation to account for the reserved gdt blocks"), 85d825dbf489
("ext4: force overhead calculation if the s_overhead_cluster makes no
sense"), and eb7054212eac ("ext4: update the cached overhead value in
the superblock").

However, since it was too expensive to forcibly recalculate the
overhead for bigalloc file systems at every mount, this didn't fix the
problem for bigalloc file systems.  This commit should address the
problem when resizing file systems with the bigalloc feature enabled.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629040026.112371-1-tytso@mit.edu
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/ext4/resize.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
index 56c9ef0687fc..fa3c854125bb 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -1472,6 +1472,7 @@ static void ext4_update_super(struct super_block *sb,
 	 * Update the fs overhead information
 	 */
 	ext4_calculate_overhead(sb);
+	es->s_overhead_clusters = cpu_to_le32(sbi->s_overhead);

 	if (test_opt(sb, DEBUG))
 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "EXT4-fs: added group %u:"
-- 
2.35.1