linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.18 0252/1095] perf/core: Add perf_clear_branch_entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220815180440.172989977@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:54:11 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.18 0252/1095] perf/core: Add perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() helper

From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit bfe4daf850f45d92dcd3da477f0b0456620294c3 ]

Make it simpler to reset all the info fields on the
perf_branch_entry by adding a helper inline function.

The goal is to centralize the initialization to avoid missing
a field in case more are added.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220322221517.2510440-2-eranian@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
 include/linux/perf_event.h  | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 1f156098a5bf..4f70fb6c2c1e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -769,6 +769,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable_all(void)
 void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 {
 	unsigned long mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
+	struct perf_branch_entry *br = cpuc->lbr_entries;
 	u64 tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
 	int i;
 
@@ -784,15 +785,11 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 
 		rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + lbr_idx, msr_lastbranch.lbr);
 
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from	= msr_lastbranch.from;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].to		= msr_lastbranch.to;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].mispred	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].predicted	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].in_tx	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].abort	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].cycles	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].type	= 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[i].reserved	= 0;
+		perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(br);
+
+		br->from	= msr_lastbranch.from;
+		br->to		= msr_lastbranch.to;
+		br++;
 	}
 	cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;
 	cpuc->lbr_stack.hw_idx = tos;
@@ -807,6 +804,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 {
 	bool need_info = false, call_stack = false;
 	unsigned long mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
+	struct perf_branch_entry *br = cpuc->lbr_entries;
 	u64 tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
 	int i;
 	int out = 0;
@@ -878,15 +876,14 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 		if (abort && x86_pmu.lbr_double_abort && out > 0)
 			out--;
 
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].from	 = from;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].to	 = to;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].mispred	 = mis;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].predicted = pred;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].in_tx	 = in_tx;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].abort	 = abort;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].cycles	 = cycles;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].type	 = 0;
-		cpuc->lbr_entries[out].reserved	 = 0;
+		perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(br+out);
+		br[out].from	 = from;
+		br[out].to	 = to;
+		br[out].mispred	 = mis;
+		br[out].predicted = pred;
+		br[out].in_tx	 = in_tx;
+		br[out].abort	 = abort;
+		br[out].cycles	 = cycles;
 		out++;
 	}
 	cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = out;
@@ -951,6 +948,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_store_lbr(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
 		to = rdlbr_to(i, lbr);
 		info = rdlbr_info(i, lbr);
 
+		perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(e);
+
 		e->from		= from;
 		e->to		= to;
 		e->mispred	= get_lbr_mispred(info);
@@ -959,7 +958,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_store_lbr(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
 		e->abort	= !!(info & LBR_INFO_ABORT);
 		e->cycles	= get_lbr_cycles(info);
 		e->type		= get_lbr_br_type(info);
-		e->reserved	= 0;
 	}
 
 	cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index af97dd427501..a411080d5169 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1063,6 +1063,22 @@ static inline void perf_sample_data_init(struct perf_sample_data *data,
 	data->txn = 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Clear all bitfields in the perf_branch_entry.
+ * The to and from fields are not cleared because they are
+ * systematically modified by caller.
+ */
+static inline void perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(struct perf_branch_entry *br)
+{
+	br->mispred = 0;
+	br->predicted = 0;
+	br->in_tx = 0;
+	br->abort = 0;
+	br->cycles = 0;
+	br->type = 0;
+	br->reserved = 0;
+}
+
 extern void perf_output_sample(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 			       struct perf_event_header *header,
 			       struct perf_sample_data *data,
-- 
2.35.1