linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 (REPOST)] rapidio/tsi721: Replace flush_scheduled_work() with flush

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220814171422.49b14550b9f3f3794166316e@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 14 Aug 2022 17:14:22 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:     Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 (REPOST)] rapidio/tsi721: Replace
 flush_scheduled_work() with flush_work().

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 10:02:13 +0900 Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> wrote:

> Since "struct tsi721_device" is per a device struct, I assume that
> tsi721_remove() needs to wait for only two works associated with that
> device. Therefore, wait for only these works using flush_work().

The changelog provides no reason for making this change.  Correctness?
Efficiency?