[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220815180442.825390550@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:55:14 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.18 0315/1095] selftests/bpf: Fix test_run logic in fexit_stress.c
From: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit eb7b36ce47f830a01ad9405e673b563cc3638d5d ]
In the commit da00d2f117a0 ("bpf: Add test ops for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING"),
the bpf_fentry_test1 function was moved into bpf_prog_test_run_tracing(),
which is the test_run function of the tracing BPF programs.
Thus calling 'bpf_prog_test_run_opts(filter_fd, &topts)' will not trigger
bpf_fentry_test1 function as filter_fd is a sk_filter BPF program.
Fix it by replacing filter_fd with fexit_fd in the bpf_prog_test_run_opts()
function.
Fixes: da00d2f117a0 ("bpf: Add test ops for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220521151329.648013-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c | 32 +++----------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c
index 3ee2107bbf7a..58b03d1a70c8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_stress.c
@@ -7,11 +7,9 @@
void test_fexit_stress(void)
{
- char test_skb[128] = {};
int fexit_fd[CNT] = {};
int link_fd[CNT] = {};
- char error[4096];
- int err, i, filter_fd;
+ int err, i;
const struct bpf_insn trace_program[] = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
@@ -20,25 +18,9 @@ void test_fexit_stress(void)
LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, trace_opts,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FEXIT,
- .log_buf = error,
- .log_size = sizeof(error),
);
- const struct bpf_insn skb_program[] = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- };
-
- LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, skb_opts,
- .log_buf = error,
- .log_size = sizeof(error),
- );
-
- LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
- .data_in = test_skb,
- .data_size_in = sizeof(test_skb),
- .repeat = 1,
- );
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
err = libbpf_find_vmlinux_btf_id("bpf_fentry_test1",
trace_opts.expected_attach_type);
@@ -58,15 +40,9 @@ void test_fexit_stress(void)
goto out;
}
- filter_fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, NULL, "GPL",
- skb_program, sizeof(skb_program) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn),
- &skb_opts);
- if (!ASSERT_GE(filter_fd, 0, "test_program_loaded"))
- goto out;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(fexit_fd[0], &topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
- err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(filter_fd, &topts);
- close(filter_fd);
- CHECK_FAIL(err);
out:
for (i = 0; i < CNT; i++) {
if (link_fd[i])
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists