[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220815061208.65945-1-xu.panda@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 06:12:08 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: hannes@...xchg.org
Cc: mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeelb@...gle.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xupanda <xu.panda@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealic@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] mm: memcontrol: Fix typos in comment Fix a spelling mistake in comment.
From: xupanda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealic@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: xupanda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
Thanks-to: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index b69979c9ced5..4dddd8be320a 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static void invalidate_reclaim_iterators(struct mem_cgroup *dead_memcg)
} while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)));
/*
- * When cgruop1 non-hierarchy mode is used,
+ * When cgroup1 non-hierarchy mode is used,
* parent_mem_cgroup() does not walk all the way up to the
* cgroup root (root_mem_cgroup). So we have to handle
* dead_memcg from cgroup root separately.
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists