linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.18 1021/1095] btrfs: let can_allocate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220815180511.327770468@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 20:07:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
        Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.18 1021/1095] btrfs: let can_allocate_chunk return error

From: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>

[ Upstream commit bb9950d3df7169a673c594d38fb74e241ed4fb2a ]

For the later patch, convert the return type from bool to int and return
errors. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index f45ecd939a2c..8bdcbc0c6d60 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -3985,12 +3985,12 @@ static void found_extent(struct find_free_extent_ctl *ffe_ctl,
 	}
 }
 
-static bool can_allocate_chunk(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
-			       struct find_free_extent_ctl *ffe_ctl)
+static int can_allocate_chunk(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+			      struct find_free_extent_ctl *ffe_ctl)
 {
 	switch (ffe_ctl->policy) {
 	case BTRFS_EXTENT_ALLOC_CLUSTERED:
-		return true;
+		return 0;
 	case BTRFS_EXTENT_ALLOC_ZONED:
 		/*
 		 * If we have enough free space left in an already
@@ -4000,8 +4000,8 @@ static bool can_allocate_chunk(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 		 */
 		if (ffe_ctl->max_extent_size >= ffe_ctl->min_alloc_size &&
 		    !btrfs_can_activate_zone(fs_info->fs_devices, ffe_ctl->flags))
-			return false;
-		return true;
+			return -ENOSPC;
+		return 0;
 	default:
 		BUG();
 	}
@@ -4083,8 +4083,9 @@ static int find_free_extent_update_loop(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 			int exist = 0;
 
 			/*Check if allocation policy allows to create a new chunk */
-			if (!can_allocate_chunk(fs_info, ffe_ctl))
-				return -ENOSPC;
+			ret = can_allocate_chunk(fs_info, ffe_ctl);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
 
 			trans = current->journal_info;
 			if (trans)
-- 
2.35.1