[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220815042623-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 04:28:29 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@...razel.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: upstream kernel crashes
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 01:15:27AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-08-15 03:51:34 -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > It is possible that GCP gets confused if ring size is smaller than the
> > device maximum simply because no one did it in the past.
> >
> > So I pushed just the revert of 762faee5a267 to the test branch.
> > Could you give it a spin?
>
> Seems to fix the issue, at least to the extent I can determine at 1am... :)
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
So you tested this:
commit 13df5a7eaeb22561d39354b576bc98a7e2c389f9 (HEAD, kernel.org/test)
Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Date: Mon Aug 15 03:44:38 2022 -0400
Revert "virtio_net: set the default max ring size by find_vqs()"
This reverts commit 762faee5a2678559d3dc09d95f8f2c54cd0466a7.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
and it fixes both issues right? No crashes no networking issue?
Just making sure before I send this upstream as a stop-gap.
We need to figure out what is going on since I think there's a GCP
hypervisor bug that we need to find a way to detect and work around but
that can wait.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists