lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220815093934.GA29323@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:39:35 +0200
From:   Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To:     Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>
Cc:     Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@...cle.com>, lizefan.x@...edance.com,
        hannes@...xchg.org, tglx@...utronix.de, steven.price@....com,
        peterz@...radead.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi@...wei.com>,
        Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: Query regarding deadlock involving cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem and
 cpu_hotplug_lock

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:25:52PM +0800, Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com> wrote:
> Your means is that the problem should be fixed by [1]+[2]'s revert ?

I understood that was already the combination you had tested.
You write in [T] that [1] alone causes (another) deadlock and therefore
the revert of [2] was suggested.

> I just tested the case which reverted the [2]. Need I test with [1] and [2]?

It'd be better (unless you haven't already :-), my reasoning is for the
[1]+[2] combo.

Thanks,
Michal

[T] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAB8ipk_gCLtvEahsp2DvPJf4NxRsM8WCYmmH=yTd7zQE+81_Yg@mail.gmail.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ