[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <134bce02-58d6-8553-bb73-42dfda18a595@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:09:11 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Trigger Huang <Trigger.Huang@...il.com>,
Gert Wollny <gert.wollny@...labora.com>,
Antonio Caggiano <antonio.caggiano@...labora.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/ttm: Refcount allocated tail pages
On 8/15/22 13:05, Christian König wrote:
> Am 15.08.22 um 11:54 schrieb Dmitry Osipenko:
>> Higher order pages allocated using alloc_pages() aren't refcounted and
>> they
>> need to be refcounted, otherwise it's impossible to map them by KVM. This
>> patch sets the refcount of the tail pages and fixes the KVM memory
>> mapping
>> faults.
>>
>> Without this change guest virgl driver can't map host buffers into guest
>> and can't provide OpenGL 4.5 profile support to the guest. The host
>> mappings are also needed for enabling the Venus driver using host GPU
>> drivers that are utilizing TTM.
>>
>> Based on a patch proposed by Trigger Huang.
>
> Well I can't count how often I have repeated this: This is an absolutely
> clear NAK!
>
> TTM pages are not reference counted in the first place and because of
> this giving them to virgl is illegal.
A? The first page is refcounted when allocated, the tail pages are not.
> Please immediately stop this completely broken approach. We have
> discussed this multiple times now.
Could you please give me a link to these discussions?
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists