[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53216533-d0d6-90d5-b9d1-c7d935867a54@tronnes.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:48:20 +0200
From: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
Mateusz Kwiatkowski <kfyatek+publicgit@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Dom Cobley <dom@...pberrypi.com>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/35] drm/atomic: Add TV subconnector property to
get/set_property
Den 15.08.2022 09.35, skrev Maxime Ripard:
> Hi Noralf,
>
> Thanks for your review
>
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>> Den 29.07.2022 18.34, skrev Maxime Ripard:
>>> The subconnector property was created by drm_mode_create_tv_properties(),
>>> but wasn't exposed to the userspace through the generic
>>> atomic_get/set_property implementation, and wasn't stored in any generic
>>> state structure.
>>>
>>> Let's solve this.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
>>
>> I just realised that this and the select_subconnector property isn't
>> used by any drivers. Do you plan to use them? Maybe they don't need to
>> be wired up at all.
>
> I'm not sure really
>
> It's true that the subconnector and select_subconnector fields in the TV
> connector state aren't used by any driver, but the ch7006 and nouveau
> will update the property content through a call to
> drm_object_property_set_value
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/ch7006_drv.c#L217
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/tvnv17.c#L185
>
> I think it could still be useful to report it in the connector state, if
> only for consistency?
>
Yeah maybe.
I just realised that I have support in the GUD protocol for these
properties so any future devices that rely on them them will need this
patch, so I'm now suddenly in favor of this :)
Noralf.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists