lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:47:56 +0300 From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com> To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> Cc: rafael@...nel.org, vadimp@...lanox.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Revert "mlxsw: core: Use different get_trend() callbacks for different thermal zones" On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:10:31AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > This reverts commit 2dc2f760052da4925482ecdcdc5c94d4a599153c. > > As discussed in the thread: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/f3c62ebe-7d59-c537-a010-bff366c8aeba@linaro.org/ > > the feature provided by commits 2dc2f760052da and 6f73862fabd93 is > actually already handled by the thermal framework via the cooling > device state aggregation, thus all this code is pointless. > > No conflict happened when reverting the patch. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> > Tested-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...dia.com> Daniel, the intention is to send these patches to mainline as part of your 6.1 pull request? I discussed it with Vadim yesterday and we do not expect changes in the file during the current cycle so this is OK as far as we are concerned, but I believe this will also need an ack from one of the netdev maintainers. Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists