linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 linux-next] mm: memcontrol: Fix a typo in comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4323bf73-7a29-7a0e-55ef-b75fcfa76414@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 20:26:01 +0530
From:   Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
To:     <cgel.zte@...il.com>, <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC:     <mhocko@...nel.org>, <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        <shakeelb@...gle.com>, <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        xupanda <xu.panda@....com.cn>, Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 linux-next] mm: memcontrol: Fix a typo in comment


On 8/15/2022 12:21 PM, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: xupanda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
> 
> Fix a spelling mistake in comment.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: xupanda <xu.panda@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@...il.com>
> 
> ---
> Change for v2:
>   - fix wrong title
> ---
> 
>   mm/memcontrol.c     |  2 +-
>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index b69979c9ced5..4dddd8be320a 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static void invalidate_reclaim_iterators(struct mem_cgroup *dead_memcg)
>   	} while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)));
>   
>   	/*
> -	 * When cgruop1 non-hierarchy mode is used,
> +	 * When cgroup1 non-hierarchy mode is used,

Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>

-Mukesh

>   	 * parent_mem_cgroup() does not walk all the way up to the
>   	 * cgroup root (root_mem_cgroup). So we have to handle
>   	 * dead_memcg from cgroup root separately.