[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yvpq3JDk8fTgdMv8@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:48:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ftrace: Add support to keep some functions out of ftrace
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:35:53AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 8:28 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:17:42AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > It's hiding a fake function from ftrace, since it's not a function
> > > and ftrace infra shouldn't show it tracing logs.
> > > In other words it's a _notrace_ function with nop5.
> >
> > Then make it a notrace function with a nop5 in it. That isn't hard.
>
> That's exactly what we're trying to do.
All the while claiming ftrace is broken while it is not.
> Jiri's patch is one way to achieve that.
Fairly horrible way.
> What is your suggestion?
Mailed it already.
> Move it from C to asm ?
Would be much better than proposed IMO.
> Make it naked function with explicit inline asm?
Can be made to work but is iffy because the compiler can do horrible
things with placing the asm().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists