linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: bitbang: Fix lsb-first Rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Aug 2022 16:58:15 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: bitbang: Fix lsb-first Rx

On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:58:57 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Shifting the recieved bit by "bits" inserts it at the top of the
> *currently remaining* Tx data, so we end up accumulating the whole
> transfer into bit 0 of the output word. Oops.
> 
> For the algorithm to work as intended, we need to remember where the
> top of the *original* word was, and shift Rx to there.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: bitbang: Fix lsb-first Rx
      commit: 46f7ac3d7892e808c9ba01c39da6bb85cda26ecd

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark