[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ed022dd-3026-542a-c3b0-e4f4005208aa@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:53:45 +0200
From: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao22@...il.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: increase scsi device's iodone_cnt in scsi_timeout()
On 8/15/22 18:43, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> The iodone_cnt might be less than iorequest_cnt because
> we did not increase the iodone_cnt when a command is done
> from timeout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index 448748e3fba5..d21ae0090166 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ enum blk_eh_timer_return scsi_timeout(struct request *req)
> */
> if (test_and_set_bit(SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, &scmd->state))
> return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
> + atomic_inc(&scmd->device->iodone_cnt);
> if (scsi_abort_command(scmd) != SUCCESS) {
> set_host_byte(scmd, DID_TIME_OUT);
> scsi_eh_scmd_add(scmd);
Not sure, but can't we still get a (late) regular completion even after the
timeout happened (double accounting) and before we successfully aborted the
command?
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind regards
Steffen Maier
Linux on IBM Z and LinuxONE
https://www.ibm.com/privacy/us/en/
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen
Geschaeftsfuehrung: David Faller
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
Powered by blists - more mailing lists