[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YvqIMyIDR334j3to@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 19:53:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: Simplify load_unaligned_zeropad() (was Re: [GIT PULL] Ceph
updates for 5.20-rc1)
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:58:21AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The other question I had was actually the "return false" above - I
> decided that if the address of the fault does *not* match the expected
> "round %rdx up" address, we shouldn't do any fixup at all, and treat
> it as a regular kernel oops - as if the exception table hadn't been
> found at all.
Ah yes, I did see that and I agree, that seems like the right thing to do.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists