linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 01/10] mm/demotion: Add support for explicit memory tiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC=cRTNDN7mHvHfk=bSN5SDUY864+1EOAOAg6Wd030ENWfY+fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:28:51 +0800
From:   huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
To:     "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, jvgediya.oss@...il.com,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 01/10] mm/demotion: Add support for explicit memory tiers

On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 1:58 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V
<aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

[snip]

> diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..bc7c1b799bef
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _LINUX_MEMORY_TIERS_H
> +#define _LINUX_MEMORY_TIERS_H
> +
> +/*
> + * Each tier cover a abstrace distance chunk size of 128
> + */
> +#define MEMTIER_CHUNK_BITS     7
> +#define MEMTIER_CHUNK_SIZE     (1 << MEMTIER_CHUNK_BITS)
> +/*
> + * Smaller abstract distance value imply faster(higher) memory tiers.
> + */
> +#define MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM (4 * MEMTIER_CHUNK_SIZE)

This will make the abstract distance of DRAM the start of its memory
tier.  So that any memory type that is slightly slower than DRAM will
be put in a lower memory tier.  So I think it's better to put the DRAM
at the middle of its memory tier by default.  For example,

    4 * MEMTIER_CHUNK_SIZE + MEMTIER_CHUNK_SIZE / 2

> +
> +#endif  /* _LINUX_MEMORY_TIERS_H */

[snip]

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying