[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <166064248071.3502205.10036394558814861778.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:34:40 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: yin31149@...il.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] net: Fix suspicious RCU usage in bpf_sk_reuseport_detach()
bpf_sk_reuseport_detach() calls __rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_with_flags()
to obtain the value of sk->sk_user_data, but that function is only usable
if the RCU read lock is held, and neither that function nor any of its
callers hold it.
Fix this by adding a new helper, __locked_read_sk_user_data_with_flags()
that checks to see if sk->sk_callback_lock() is held and use that here
instead.
Alternatively, making __rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_with_flags() use
rcu_dereference_checked() might suffice.
Without this, the following warning can be occasionally observed:
=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
6.0.0-rc1-build2+ #563 Not tainted
-----------------------------
include/net/sock.h:592 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
5 locks held by locktest/29873:
#0: ffff88812734b550 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __sock_release+0x77/0x121
#1: ffff88812f5621b0 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_close+0x1c/0x70
#2: ffff88810312f5c8 (&h->lhash2[i].lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: inet_unhash+0x76/0x1c0
#3: ffffffff83768bb8 (reuseport_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: reuseport_detach_sock+0x18/0xdd
#4: ffff88812f562438 (clock-AF_INET){++..}-{2:2}, at: bpf_sk_reuseport_detach+0x24/0xa4
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 29873 Comm: locktest Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1-build2+ #563
Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x4c/0x5f
bpf_sk_reuseport_detach+0x6d/0xa4
reuseport_detach_sock+0x75/0xdd
inet_unhash+0xa5/0x1c0
tcp_set_state+0x169/0x20f
? lockdep_sock_is_held+0x3a/0x3a
? __lock_release.isra.0+0x13e/0x220
? reacquire_held_locks+0x1bb/0x1bb
? hlock_class+0x31/0x96
? mark_lock+0x9e/0x1af
__tcp_close+0x50/0x4b6
tcp_close+0x28/0x70
inet_release+0x8e/0xa7
__sock_release+0x95/0x121
sock_close+0x14/0x17
__fput+0x20f/0x36a
task_work_run+0xa3/0xcc
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x9c/0x14d
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x18/0x44
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
Fixes: cf8c1e967224 ("net: refactor bpf_sk_reuseport_detach()")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@...il.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
---
include/net/sock.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 05a1bbdf5805..d08cfe190a78 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -577,6 +577,31 @@ static inline bool sk_user_data_is_nocopy(const struct sock *sk)
#define __sk_user_data(sk) ((*((void __rcu **)&(sk)->sk_user_data)))
+/**
+ * __locked_read_sk_user_data_with_flags - return the pointer
+ * only if argument flags all has been set in sk_user_data. Otherwise
+ * return NULL
+ *
+ * @sk: socket
+ * @flags: flag bits
+ *
+ * The caller must be holding sk->sk_callback_lock.
+ */
+static inline void *
+__locked_read_sk_user_data_with_flags(const struct sock *sk,
+ uintptr_t flags)
+{
+ uintptr_t sk_user_data =
+ (uintptr_t)rcu_dereference_check(__sk_user_data(sk),
+ lockdep_is_held(&sk->sk_callback_lock));
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & SK_USER_DATA_PTRMASK);
+
+ if ((sk_user_data & flags) == flags)
+ return (void *)(sk_user_data & SK_USER_DATA_PTRMASK);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
/**
* __rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_with_flags - return the pointer
* only if argument flags all has been set in sk_user_data. Otherwise
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c b/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c
index 85fa9dbfa8bf..82c61612f382 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ void bpf_sk_reuseport_detach(struct sock *sk)
struct sock __rcu **socks;
write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
- socks = __rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_with_flags(sk, SK_USER_DATA_BPF);
+ socks = __locked_read_sk_user_data_with_flags(sk, SK_USER_DATA_BPF);
if (socks) {
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_user_data, NULL);
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists