| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 20:44:28 +0800
From: Ding Hui <dinghui@...gfor.com.cn>
To: Anatolii Gerasymenko <anatolii.gerasymenko@...el.com>,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, keescook@...omium.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net v2 1/1] ice: Fix crash by keep old cfg when update TCs more
than queues
On 2022/8/16 17:13, Anatolii Gerasymenko wrote:
> On 15.08.2022 03:18, Ding Hui wrote:
>> There are problems if allocated queues less than Traffic Classes.
>>
>> Commit a632b2a4c920 ("ice: ethtool: Prohibit improper channel config
>> for DCB") already disallow setting less queues than TCs.
>>
>> Another case is if we first set less queues, and later update more TCs
>> config due to LLDP, ice_vsi_cfg_tc() will failed but left dirty
>> num_txq/rxq and tc_cfg in vsi, that will cause invalid porinter access.
>
> Nice catch. Looks good to me.
Thanks, I'll send v3 later, could I add Acked-by: tag too?
>
>> [ 95.968089] ice 0000:3b:00.1: More TCs defined than queues/rings allocated.
>> [ 95.968092] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Trying to use more Rx queues (8), than were allocated (1)!
>> [ 95.968093] ice 0000:3b:00.1: Failed to config TC for VSI index: 0
>> [ 95.969621] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
>> [ 95.969705] CPU: 1 PID: 58405 Comm: lldpad Kdump: loaded Tainted: G U W O --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1
>> [ 95.969867] Hardware name: O.E.M/BC11SPSCB10, BIOS 8.23 12/30/2021
>> [ 95.969992] RIP: 0010:devm_kmalloc+0xa/0x60
>> [ 95.970052] Code: 5c ff ff ff 31 c0 5b 5d 41 5c c3 b8 f4 ff ff ff eb f4 0f 1f 40 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 89 d1 <8b> 97 60 02 00 00 48 8d 7e 18 48 39 f7 72 3f 55 89 ce 53 48 8b 4c
>> [ 95.970344] RSP: 0018:ffffc9003f553888 EFLAGS: 00010206
>> [ 95.970425] RAX: dead000000000200 RBX: ffffea003c425b00 RCX: 00000000006080c0
>> [ 95.970536] RDX: 00000000006080c0 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: dead000000000200
>> [ 95.970648] RBP: dead000000000200 R08: 00000000000463c0 R09: ffff888ffa900000
>> [ 95.970760] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff888ff6b40100
>> [ 95.970870] R13: ffff888ff6a55018 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888ff6a55460
>> [ 95.970981] FS: 00007f51b7d24700(0000) GS:ffff88903ee80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [ 95.971108] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> [ 95.971197] CR2: 00007fac5410d710 CR3: 0000000f2c1de002 CR4: 00000000007606e0
>> [ 95.971309] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> [ 95.971419] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> [ 95.971530] PKRU: 55555554
>> [ 95.971573] Call Trace:
>> [ 95.971622] ice_setup_rx_ring+0x39/0x110 [ice]
>> [ 95.971695] ice_vsi_setup_rx_rings+0x54/0x90 [ice]
>> [ 95.971774] ice_vsi_open+0x25/0x120 [ice]
>> [ 95.971843] ice_open_internal+0xb8/0x1f0 [ice]
>> [ 95.971919] ice_ena_vsi+0x4f/0xd0 [ice]
>> [ 95.971987] ice_dcb_ena_dis_vsi.constprop.5+0x29/0x90 [ice]
>> [ 95.972082] ice_pf_dcb_cfg+0x29a/0x380 [ice]
>> [ 95.972154] ice_dcbnl_setets+0x174/0x1b0 [ice]
>> [ 95.972220] dcbnl_ieee_set+0x89/0x230
>> [ 95.972279] ? dcbnl_ieee_del+0x150/0x150
>> [ 95.972341] dcb_doit+0x124/0x1b0
>> [ 95.972392] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x243/0x2f0
>> [ 95.972457] ? dcb_doit+0x14d/0x1b0
>> [ 95.972510] ? __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x1d3/0x280
>> [ 95.972591] ? rtnl_calcit.isra.31+0x100/0x100
>> [ 95.972661] netlink_rcv_skb+0xcf/0xf0
>> [ 95.972720] netlink_unicast+0x16d/0x220
>> [ 95.972781] netlink_sendmsg+0x2ba/0x3a0
>> [ 95.975891] sock_sendmsg+0x4c/0x50
>> [ 95.979032] ___sys_sendmsg+0x2e4/0x300
>> [ 95.982147] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x13e/0x190
>> [ 95.985242] ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x79/0x90
>> [ 95.988338] ? __check_object_size+0xac/0x1b0
>> [ 95.991440] ? _copy_to_user+0x22/0x30
>> [ 95.994539] ? move_addr_to_user+0xbb/0xd0
>> [ 95.997619] ? __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80
>> [ 96.000664] __sys_sendmsg+0x53/0x80
>> [ 96.003747] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1d0
>> [ 96.006862] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
>>
>> Only update num_txq/rxq when passed check, and restore tc_cfg if setup
>> queue map failed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Hui <dinghui@...gfor.com.cn>
>
> Please, also add Fixes tag.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 42 +++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> ---
>> v1:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220812123933.5481-1-dinghui@sangfor.com.cn/
>>
>> v2:
>> rewrite subject
>> rebase to net
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
>> index a830f7f9aed0..6e64cca30351 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
>> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static void ice_set_dflt_vsi_ctx(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt)
>> */
>> static int ice_vsi_setup_q_map(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt)
>> {
>> - u16 offset = 0, qmap = 0, tx_count = 0, pow = 0;
>> + u16 offset = 0, qmap = 0, tx_count = 0, rx_count = 0, pow = 0;
>> u16 num_txq_per_tc, num_rxq_per_tc;
>> u16 qcount_tx = vsi->alloc_txq;
>> u16 qcount_rx = vsi->alloc_rxq;
>> @@ -981,23 +981,25 @@ static int ice_vsi_setup_q_map(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt)
>> * at least 1)
>> */
>> if (offset)
>> - vsi->num_rxq = offset;
>> + rx_count = offset;
>> else
>> - vsi->num_rxq = num_rxq_per_tc;
>> + rx_count = num_rxq_per_tc;
>>
>> - if (vsi->num_rxq > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
>> + if (rx_count > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
>> dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Rx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
>> - vsi->num_rxq, vsi->alloc_rxq);
>> + rx_count, vsi->alloc_rxq);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - vsi->num_txq = tx_count;
>> - if (vsi->num_txq > vsi->alloc_txq) {
>> + if (tx_count > vsi->alloc_txq) {
>> dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Tx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
>> - vsi->num_txq, vsi->alloc_txq);
>> + tx_count, vsi->alloc_txq);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + vsi->num_txq = tx_count;
>> + vsi->num_rxq = rx_count;
>> +
>> if (vsi->type == ICE_VSI_VF && vsi->num_txq != vsi->num_rxq) {
>> dev_dbg(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "VF VSI should have same number of Tx and Rx queues. Hence making them equal\n");
>> /* since there is a chance that num_rxq could have been changed
>> @@ -3492,6 +3494,7 @@ ice_vsi_setup_q_map_mqprio(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt,
>> int tc0_qcount = vsi->mqprio_qopt.qopt.count[0];
>> u8 netdev_tc = 0;
>> int i;
>> + u16 new_txq, new_rxq;
>
> Please follow the Reverse Christmas Tree (RCT) convention.
>
>> vsi->tc_cfg.ena_tc = ena_tc ? ena_tc : 1;
>>
>> @@ -3530,21 +3533,24 @@ ice_vsi_setup_q_map_mqprio(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_vsi_ctx *ctxt,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - /* Set actual Tx/Rx queue pairs */
>> - vsi->num_txq = offset + qcount_tx;
>> - if (vsi->num_txq > vsi->alloc_txq) {
>> + new_txq = offset + qcount_tx;
>> + if (new_txq > vsi->alloc_txq) {
>> dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Tx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
>> - vsi->num_txq, vsi->alloc_txq);
>> + new_txq, vsi->alloc_txq);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - vsi->num_rxq = offset + qcount_rx;
>> - if (vsi->num_rxq > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
>> + new_rxq = offset + qcount_rx;
>> + if (new_rxq > vsi->alloc_rxq) {
>> dev_err(ice_pf_to_dev(vsi->back), "Trying to use more Rx queues (%u), than were allocated (%u)!\n",
>> - vsi->num_rxq, vsi->alloc_rxq);
>> + new_rxq, vsi->alloc_rxq);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + /* Set actual Tx/Rx queue pairs */
>> + vsi->num_txq = new_txq;
>> + vsi->num_rxq = new_rxq;
>> +
>> /* Setup queue TC[0].qmap for given VSI context */
>> ctxt->info.tc_mapping[0] = cpu_to_le16(qmap);
>> ctxt->info.q_mapping[0] = cpu_to_le16(vsi->rxq_map[0]);
>> @@ -3580,6 +3586,7 @@ int ice_vsi_cfg_tc(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u8 ena_tc)
>> struct device *dev;
>> int i, ret = 0;
>> u8 num_tc = 0;
>> + struct ice_tc_cfg old_tc_cfg;
>
> RCT here also.
>
>> dev = ice_pf_to_dev(pf);
>> if (vsi->tc_cfg.ena_tc == ena_tc &&
>> @@ -3600,6 +3607,7 @@ int ice_vsi_cfg_tc(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u8 ena_tc)
>> max_txqs[i] = vsi->num_txq;
>> }
>>
>> + memcpy(&old_tc_cfg, &vsi->tc_cfg, sizeof(old_tc_cfg));
>> vsi->tc_cfg.ena_tc = ena_tc;
>> vsi->tc_cfg.numtc = num_tc;
>>
>> @@ -3616,8 +3624,10 @@ int ice_vsi_cfg_tc(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u8 ena_tc)
>> else
>> ret = ice_vsi_setup_q_map(vsi, ctx);
>>
>> - if (ret)
>> + if (ret) {
>> + memcpy(&vsi->tc_cfg, &old_tc_cfg, sizeof(vsi->tc_cfg));
>> goto out;
>> + }
>>
>> /* must to indicate which section of VSI context are being modified */
>> ctx->info.valid_sections = cpu_to_le16(ICE_AQ_VSI_PROP_RXQ_MAP_VALID);
--
Thanks,
- Ding Hui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists