[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1349b271-796b-c9d2-a568-f9be84926ed4@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:57:02 +0300
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: "zhiyong.tao" <zhiyong.tao@...iatek.com>
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, eddie.huang@...iatek.com,
a.zummo@...ertech.it, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
fshao@...omium.org, sen.chu@...iatek.com, hui.liu@...iatek.com,
allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com, hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, macpaul.lin@...iatek.com,
wen.su@...iatek.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] regulator: dt-bindings: mediatek: add mt6366
On 16/08/2022 15:54, zhiyong.tao wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-08-12 at 15:55 +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 at 15:52, zhiyong.tao <zhiyong.tao@...iatek.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2022-08-12 at 13:55 +0300, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 12/08/2022 12:29, Zhiyong Tao wrote:
>>>>> Add mt6366 regulator document
>>>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +properties:
>>>>> + compatible:
>>>>> + const: mediatek,mt6366-regulator
>>>>> +
>>>>> + regulators:
>>>>> + type: object
>>>>> + description: List of regulators and its properties
>>>>> +
>>>>> + patternProperties:
>>>>> + "^buck-
>>>>> v(dram1|core|coresshub|proc11|proc12|gpu|s2|modem|s1)$":
>>>>> + type: object
>>>>> + $ref: regulator.yaml#
>>>>> + unevaluatedProperties: false
>>>>> +
>>>>> + "^ldo-v(dram2|sim1|ibr|rf12|usb|camio|camd|cn18|fe28)$":
>>>>> + type: object
>>>>> + $ref: regulator.yaml#
>>>>
>>>> You miss unevaluatedProperties in most of the places.
>>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>> Thanks for your suggestion,
>>> Do you mean that all places should have the
>>> unevaluatedProperties
>>> Properties ?
>>
>> Yes. You put it in some of the places which does not really make
>> sense...
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
> Thanks for your suggestion,
> We find that if there is a properties "compatible = "regulator-
> fixed";" in ldo-vrf12, we should set unevaluatedProperties as true.
> or it will check yaml warning "Unevaluated Properties are not
> allowed('compatible' was unexpected)". is it right?
> There is a properties "compatible = "regulator-fixed";"in ldo-vrf12.
> It will cause the checking yaml error "ldo-vrf12: 'regulator-name' is a
> required property". Can you help to give a suggestion to fix the
> warning? Add regulator-name for ldo-vrf12 or other suggestion?
>
And how this regulator is supposed to work? Are you populating DT
children in your driver?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists