[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220816110717.5422e976@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:07:17 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...il.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@...edance.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] vsock: add netdev to vhost/virtio vsock
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 12:38:52 -0400 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 10:56:06AM -0700, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > In order to support usage of qdisc on vsock traffic, this commit
> > introduces a struct net_device to vhost and virtio vsock.
> >
> > Two new devices are created, vhost-vsock for vhost and virtio-vsock
> > for virtio. The devices are attached to the respective transports.
> >
> > To bypass the usage of the device, the user may "down" the associated
> > network interface using common tools. For example, "ip link set dev
> > virtio-vsock down" lets vsock bypass the net_device and qdisc entirely,
> > simply using the FIFO logic of the prior implementation.
>
> Ugh. That's quite a hack. Mark my words, at some point we will decide to
> have down mean "down". Besides, multiple net devices with link up tend
> to confuse userspace. So might want to keep it down at all times
> even short term.
Agreed!
From a cursory look (and Documentation/ would be nice..) it feels
very wrong to me. Do you know of any uses of a netdev which would
be semantically similar to what you're doing? Treating netdevs as
buildings blocks for arbitrary message passing solutions is something
I dislike quite strongly.
Could you recommend where I can learn more about vsocks?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists